Literature DB >> 22814301

Interventions to reduce or prevent obesity in pregnant women: a systematic review.

S Thangaratinam1, E Rogozińska, K Jolly, S Glinkowski, W Duda, E Borowiack, T Roseboom, J Tomlinson, J Walczak, R Kunz, B W Mol, A Coomarasamy, K S Khan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Around 50% of women of childbearing age are either overweight [body mass index (BMI) 25-29.9 kg/m(2)] or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). The antenatal period provides an opportunity to manage weight in pregnancy. This has the potential to reduce maternal and fetal complications associated with excess weight gain and obesity.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of dietary and lifestyle interventions in reducing or preventing obesity in pregnancy and to assess the beneficial and adverse effects of the interventions on obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Major electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and Science Citation Index were searched (1950 until March 2011) to identify relevant citations. Language restrictions were not applied. REVIEW
METHODS: Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and harm of the interventions were carried out using a methodology in line with current recommendations. Studies that evaluated any dietary, physical activity or mixed approach intervention with the potential to influence weight change in pregnancy were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using accepted contemporary standards. Results were summarised as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data. Continuous data were summarised as mean difference (MD) with standard deviation. The quality of the overall evidence synthesised for each outcome was summarised using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and reported graphically as a two-dimensional chart.
RESULTS: A total of 88 studies (40 randomised and 48 non-randomised and observational studies, involving 182,139 women) evaluated the effect of weight management interventions in pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. Twenty-six studies involving 468,858 women reported the adverse effect of the interventions. Meta-analysis of 30 RCTs (4503 women) showed a reduction in weight gain in the intervention group of 0.97 kg compared with the control group (95% CI -1.60 kg to -0.34 kg; p = 0.003). Weight management interventions overall in pregnancy resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence of pre-eclampsia (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92; p = 0.008) and shoulder dystocia (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.70; p = 0.02). Dietary interventions in pregnancy resulted in a significant decrease in the risk of pre-eclampsia (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85; p = 0.0009), gestational hypertension (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.88; p = 0.03) and preterm birth (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.96; p = 0.03) and showed a trend in reducing the incidence of gestational diabetes (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.03). There were no differences in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants between the groups (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.29). There were no significant maternal or fetal adverse effects observed for the interventions in the included trials. The overall strength of evidence for weight gain in pregnancy and birthweight was moderate for all interventions considered together. There was high-quality evidence for small-for-gestational-age infants as an outcome. The quality of evidence for all interventions on pregnancy outcomes was very low to moderate. The quality of evidence for all adverse outcomes was very low. LIMITATIONS: The included studies varied in the reporting of population, intensity, type and frequency of intervention and patient complience, limiting the interpretation of the findings. There was significant heterogeneity for the beneficial effect of diet on gestational weight gain.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions in pregnancy to manage weight result in a significant reduction in weight gain in pregnancy (evidence quality was moderate). Dietary interventions are the most effective type of intervention in pregnancy in reducing gestational weight gain and the risks of pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension and shoulder dystocia. There is no evidence of harm as a result of the dietary and physical activity-based interventions in pregnancy. Individual patient data meta-analysis is needed to provide robust evidence on the differential effect of intervention in various groups based on BMI, age, parity, socioeconomic status and medical conditions in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22814301      PMCID: PMC4781281          DOI: 10.3310/hta16310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  80 in total

Review 1.  [Gender Obesity Report--Influence of obesity on Reproduction and Pregnancy].

Authors:  Jürgen Harreiter; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-12-09

2.  The association of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity with delivery outcomes: a comparison of immigrant and non-immigrant women in Berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Katharina Reiss; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Theda Borde; Silke Brenne; Wolfgang Henrich; Matthias David; Oliver Razum
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Examination of Routine Use of Prenatal Weight Gain Charts as a Communication Tool for Providers.

Authors:  Marijo Aguilera; Abbey C Sidebottom; Brigitte R McCool
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-10

4.  Measuring Adherence to a Nutrition and Exercise Lifestyle Intervention: Is Program Adherence Related to Excessive Gestational Weight Gain?

Authors:  Taniya S Nagpal; Harry Prapavessis; Christina Campbell; Michelle F Mottola
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2017-05-17

Review 5.  Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-07-19

6.  High-fat/fructose feeding during prenatal and postnatal development in female rats increases susceptibility to renal and metabolic injury later in life.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Flynn; Barbara T Alexander; Jonathan Lee; Zachary M Hutchens; Christine Maric-Bilkan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  The Feasibility and Efficacy of a Behavioral Intervention to Promote Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain.

Authors:  Meghan Baruth; Rebecca A Schlaff; Samantha Deere; Jessica L Walker; Brenna L Dressler; Sarah F Wagner; Ashley Boggs; Holly A Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-12

8.  African American and White women׳s perceptions of weight gain, physical activity, and nutrition during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kara M Whitaker; Sara Wilcox; Jihong Liu; Steven N Blair; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes for pregnancies before and after gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  T D Adams; A O Hammoud; L E Davidson; B Laferrère; A Fraser; J B Stanford; M Hashibe; J L J Greenwood; J Kim; D Taylor; A J Watson; K R Smith; R McKinlay; S C Simper; S C Smith; S C Hunt
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  A randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive gestational weight gain and promote postpartum weight loss in overweight and obese women: Health In Pregnancy and Postpartum (HIPP).

Authors:  Sara Wilcox; Jihong Liu; Cheryl L Addy; Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Judith T Burgis; Ellen Wingard; Alicia A Dahl; Kara M Whitaker; Lara Schneider; Alycia K Boutté
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.