Literature DB >> 2281424

Analysis of bronchial reactivity in epidemiological studies.

M J Abramson1, N A Saunders, M J Hensley.   

Abstract

The measurement of bronchial reactivity in epidemiological studies has the advantage of quantifying an objective physiological feature of asthma. Bronchial reactivity was developed in a clinical setting and has been conventionally expressed as the dose of agonist producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20). As PD20 can be estimated for less than 20% of subjects in general community surveys with the doses of agonist that are usually given, data from most subjects must be censored. Thus PD20 alone is a poor index of bronchial reactivity for epidemiological studies. Data from 809 aluminium smelter workers were used to evaluate alternative methods of analysing bronchial reactivity. Dose-response relationships were analysed by four methods: (1) PD20 by the conventional method of interpolating the dose on a logarithmic scale between the last two measurements of FEV1; (2) PD20 (with allowance for extrapolation), estimated by fitting an exponential curve to the dose-response data; (3) the linear regression slope between dose and FEV1 when significant; (4) the dose-response slope obtained in all subjects as the % change in FEV1 from baseline in response to total dose. When each of these measures was related to symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of asthma, all differentiated between "asthmatic" and "non-asthmatic" subjects. The dose-response slope (method 4) had the advantages of simplicity and no censored data, and was shown to be clinically relevant. It is suggested that the dose-response slope should be used for the analysis of bronchial reactivity in epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2281424      PMCID: PMC462839          DOI: 10.1136/thx.45.12.924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  19 in total

1.  Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures.

Authors:  H Chai; R S Farr; L A Froehlich; D A Mathison; J A McLean; R R Rosenthal; A L Sheffer; S L Spector; R G Townley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children: the relationship between asthma and skin reactivity to allergens in two communities.

Authors:  W J Britton; A J Woolcock; J K Peat; C J Sedgwick; D M Lloyd; S R Leeder
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  The relation between change in airway reactivity and change in respiratory symptoms and medication in a community study.

Authors:  J R Britton; P G Burney; S Chinn; A O Papacosta; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1988-09

4.  Slope of the dose-response curve to inhaled histamine and methacholine and PC20 in subjects with symptoms of airway hyperexcitability and in normal subjects.

Authors:  J L Malo; A Cartier; L Pineau; G Gagnon; R R Martin
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1985-09

5.  Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness.

Authors:  K Yan; C Salome; A J Woolcock
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  The shape of the dose-response curve to histamine in asthmatic and normal subjects.

Authors:  A J Woolcock; C M Salome; K Yan
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1984-07

7.  Analysis of dose-response curves in the detection of bronchial hyperreactivity.

Authors:  V Bellia; A Rizzo; S Amoroso; A Mirabella; G Bonsignore
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Slope of the dose-response curve: usefulness in assessing bronchial responses to inhaled histamine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; B A Berscheid
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Prevalence and features of asthma in a sample survey of urban Goroka, Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  G K Dowse; D Smith; K J Turner; M P Alpers
Journal:  Clin Allergy       Date:  1985-09

10.  Prevalence of bronchial reactivity to inhaled methacholine in New Zealand children.

Authors:  M R Sears; D T Jones; M D Holdaway; C J Hewitt; E M Flannery; G P Herbison; P A Silva
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 9.139

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Methodology of bronchial responsiveness.

Authors:  S Chinn
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Usual dietary salt intake and asthma in children: a case-control study.

Authors:  K Demissie; P Ernst; K Gray Donald; L Joseph
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Reproducibility of non-specific bronchial challenge in adults: implications for design, analysis and interpretation of clinical and epidemiological studies.

Authors:  S Chinn; J P Schouten
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Comparison between two districts of the effects of an air pollution intervention on bronchial responsiveness in primary school children in Hong Kong.

Authors:  C M Wong; T H Lam; J Peters; A J Hedley; S G Ong; A Y Tam; J Liu; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Changes in symptoms of asthma and rhinitis by sensitization status over ten years in a cohort of young Chilean adults.

Authors:  Vanessa Garcia-Larsen; James F Potts; Stefano Del Giacco; Patricia Bustos; Patricia V Diaz; Hugo Amigo; Manuel Oyarzun; Roberto J Rona
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.317

6.  Airway responsiveness to methacholine and incidence of COPD: an international prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alessandro Marcon; Francesca Locatelli; Dirk Keidel; Anna B Beckmeyer-Borowko; Isa Cerveri; Shyamali C Dharmage; Elaine Fuertes; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Joachim Heinrich; Medea Imboden; Christer Janson; Ane Johannessen; Bénédicte Leynaert; Silvia Pascual Erquicia; Giancarlo Pesce; Emmanuel Schaffner; Cecilie Svanes; Isabel Urrutia; Deborah Jarvis; Nicole M Probst-Hensch; Simone Accordini
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.139

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.