Literature DB >> 15860715

Reproducibility of non-specific bronchial challenge in adults: implications for design, analysis and interpretation of clinical and epidemiological studies.

S Chinn1, J P Schouten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor reproducibility of an outcome measure reduces power and, in an independent variable, biases results. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures loss of power and degree of bias. Information is lacking on the intraclass correlation coefficient for bronchial responsiveness and factors affecting reproducibility.
METHODS: Papers containing information on reproducibility of bronchial responsiveness were identified using a Medline search and citations. Within and between person components of variance of PD20 or PC20 were expressed in doubling dose or concentration units, and the intraclass correlation coefficient calculated when not reported.
RESULTS: Results were extracted from 32 papers. Intraclass correlation coefficients were over 0.9 in short term studies of highly selected asthmatic patients, but larger and most long term studies had lower intraclass correlation coefficients, less than 0.5 in some cases, due to greater within person or lower between person variation. Reproducibility of dose or concentration-response slope was generally higher, but still less than that of forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
CONCLUSIONS: Information is available to calculate sample size for studies with bronchial responsiveness as the outcome, but results when bronchial responsiveness is an explanatory variable may be misleading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860715      PMCID: PMC1758909          DOI: 10.1136/thx.2004.039230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  47 in total

Review 1.  Methodology of bronchial responsiveness.

Authors:  S Chinn
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Interacting effects of atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness on the annual decline in lung function and the exacerbation rate in asthma.

Authors:  C P Van Schayck; E Dompeling; C L Van Herwaarden; A M Wever; C Van Weel
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-12

3.  The daily variability of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine.

Authors:  C J Trigg; N Jhalli; M J Herdman; D R Cundell; J M Thomas; R J Davies
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Covariate measurement error and the estimation of random effect parameters in a mixed model for longitudinal data.

Authors:  T D Tosteson; J P Buonaccorsi; E Demidenko
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Annual variability in methacholine responsiveness in nonasthmatic working adults.

Authors:  W S Beckett; P A Pace; S J Sferlazza; V J Carey; S T Weiss
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 6.  Interpretation of longitudinal studies. An overview.

Authors:  J P Schouten; I B Tager
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Detection of excessive bronchoconstriction in asthma.

Authors:  W J Gibbons; A Sharma; D Lougheed; P T Macklem
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Effect of change in sodium excretion on change in blood pressure corrected for measurement error. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase I.

Authors:  N R Cook; S K Kumanyika; J A Cutler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Repeatability of a rapid dosimetric method for methacholine challenge using a pocket turbine spirometer for FEV1 measurements.

Authors:  J Hedman; K Alanko; M M Nieminen
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1996-07

10.  A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects.

Authors:  A J Knox; A Wisniewski; S Cooper; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  5 in total

1.  Problems in using incidence to analyze risk factors in follow-up studies.

Authors:  J Pekkanen; J Sunyer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Mechanisms of airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma: the past, present and yet to come.

Authors:  D G Chapman; C G Irvin
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.018

3.  Variability of methacholine bronchoprovocation and the effect of inhaled corticosteroids in mild asthma.

Authors:  Kaharu Sumino; Elizabeth A Sugar; Charles G Irvin; David A Kaminsky; Dave Shade; Christine Y Wei; Janet T Holbrook; Robert A Wise; Mario Castro
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.347

4.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in an adult population in Helsinki: decreased FEV1 , the main determinant.

Authors:  Maria Juusela; Paula Pallasaho; Seppo Sarna; Päivi Piirilä; Bo Lundbäck; Anssi Sovijärvi
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Randomised placebo-controlled study of the effect of paracetamol on asthma severity in adults.

Authors:  Sally J Ioannides; Mathew Williams; Sarah Jefferies; Kyle Perrin; Mark Weatherall; Robert Siebers; Julian Crane; Mitesh Patel; Justin Travers; Philippa Shirtcliffe; Richard Beasley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.