BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic hypothermia is an effective therapy for comatose adults experiencing out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest, there is insufficient evidence that is also applicable for those with out-of-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 452 comatose adults treated with therapeutic hypothermia after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) subsequent to an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology, 372 who had a bystander-witnessed cardiac arrest, target core temperature of 32-34°C and cooling duration of 12-72 h were eligible for this study (75 cases of non-shockable cardiac arrest, 297 cases of shockable cardiac arrest). The median collapse-to-ROSC interval was significantly longer in the non-shockable group than in the shockable group (30 min vs. 22 min, P=0.008), resulting in a significantly lower frequency of 30-day favorable neurological outcome in the non-shockable group compared with the shockable group (32% vs. 66%, P<0.001). However, an analysis of data in quartiles assigned to varying lengths of collapse-to-ROSC interval revealed a similar frequency of 30-day favorable neurological outcome among both groups when the collapse-to-ROSC interval was ≤16 min (90% non-shockable group vs. 92% shockable group; odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.09-7.24, P=0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Post-ROSC cooling is an effective treatment for patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest when the time interval from collapse to ROSC is short.
BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic hypothermia is an effective therapy for comatose adults experiencing out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest, there is insufficient evidence that is also applicable for those with out-of-hospital non-shockable cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 452 comatose adults treated with therapeutic hypothermia after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) subsequent to an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology, 372 who had a bystander-witnessed cardiac arrest, target core temperature of 32-34°C and cooling duration of 12-72 h were eligible for this study (75 cases of non-shockable cardiac arrest, 297 cases of shockable cardiac arrest). The median collapse-to-ROSC interval was significantly longer in the non-shockable group than in the shockable group (30 min vs. 22 min, P=0.008), resulting in a significantly lower frequency of 30-day favorable neurological outcome in the non-shockable group compared with the shockable group (32% vs. 66%, P<0.001). However, an analysis of data in quartiles assigned to varying lengths of collapse-to-ROSC interval revealed a similar frequency of 30-day favorable neurological outcome among both groups when the collapse-to-ROSC interval was ≤16 min (90% non-shockable group vs. 92% shockable group; odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.09-7.24, P=0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Post-ROSC cooling is an effective treatment for patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest when the time interval from collapse to ROSC is short.
Authors: Shin Ahn; Byung Kook Lee; Chun Song Youn; Youn-Jung Kim; Chang Hwan Sohn; Dong-Woo Seo; Won Young Kim Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Timothy J Mader; Brian H Nathanson; William E Soares; Ryan A Coute; Bryan F McNally Journal: Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: Pedro A Villablanca; Mohammed Makkiya; Evann Einsenberg; David F Briceno; Christia Panagiota; Mark Menegus; Mario Garcia; Daniel Sims; Harish Ramakrishna Journal: Ann Card Anaesth Date: 2016 Jan-Mar
Authors: Zoon Ho Lee; Yong Hwan Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Dong Woo Lee; Kyoung Yul Lee; Seong Youn Hwang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Gi Woon Kim; Dong Keon Lee; Bo Ra Kang; Won Jung Jeong; Choung Ah Lee; Young Taeck Oh; Yu Jin Kim; Seung Min Park Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.106