Literature DB >> 22813481

Browsed twig environmental DNA: diagnostic PCR to identify ungulate species.

Ruth V Nichols1, Helena Königsson, Kjell Danell, Göran Spong.   

Abstract

Ungulate browsing can have a strong effect on ecological processes by affecting plant community structure and composition, with cascading effects on nutrient cycling and animal communities. However, in the absence of direct observations of foraging, species-specific foraging behaviours are difficult to quantify. We therefore know relatively little about foraging competition and species-specific browsing patterns in systems with several browsers. However, during browsing, a small amount of saliva containing buccal cells is deposited at the bite site, providing a source of environmental DNA (eDNA) that can be used for species identification. Here, we describe extraction and PCR protocols for a browser species diagnostic kit. Species-specific primers for mitochondrial DNA were optimized and validated using twigs browsed by captive animals. A time series showed that about 50% of the samples will amplify up to 12 weeks after the browsing event and that some samples amplify up to 24 weeks after browsing (12.5%). Applied to samples of natural browsing from an area where moose (Alces alces), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), fallow deer (Cervus dama) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) are sympatric, amplification success reached 75%. This method promises to greatly improve our understanding of multispecies browsing systems without the need for direct observations.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22813481     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03172.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  8 in total

1.  DNA left on browsed twigs uncovers bite-scale resource use patterns in European ungulates.

Authors:  Ruth V Nichols; Joris P G M Cromsigt; Göran Spong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Ancient and modern environmental DNA.

Authors:  Mikkel Winther Pedersen; Søren Overballe-Petersen; Luca Ermini; Clio Der Sarkissian; James Haile; Micaela Hellstrom; Johan Spens; Philip Francis Thomsen; Kristine Bohmann; Enrico Cappellini; Ida Bærholm Schnell; Nathan A Wales; Christian Carøe; Paula F Campos; Astrid M Z Schmidt; M Thomas P Gilbert; Anders J Hansen; Ludovic Orlando; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Reliable discrimination of 10 ungulate species using high resolution melting analysis of faecal DNA.

Authors:  Ana Ramón-Laca; Dianne Gleeson; Ivor Yockney; Michael Perry; Graham Nugent; David M Forsyth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Diet Assessment Based on Rumen Contents: A Comparison between DNA Metabarcoding and Macroscopy.

Authors:  Ruth V Nichols; Mikael Åkesson; Petter Kjellander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using eDNA to experimentally test ungulate browsing preferences.

Authors:  Ruth V Nichols; Joris P G M Cromsigt; Göran Spong
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-09-10

6.  A New Method for Noninvasive Genetic Sampling of Saliva in Ecological Research.

Authors:  Diana Lobo; Raquel Godinho; Francisco Álvares; José V López-Bao; Alejandro Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Environmental DNA from Residual Saliva for Efficient Noninvasive Genetic Monitoring of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos).

Authors:  Rachel E Wheat; Jennifer M Allen; Sophie D L Miller; Christopher C Wilmers; Taal Levi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An environmental DNA sampling method for aye-ayes from their feeding traces.

Authors:  Megan L Aylward; Alexis P Sullivan; George H Perry; Steig E Johnson; Edward E Louis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.