Literature DB >> 22811394

Multistate approaches in computational protein design.

James A Davey1, Roberto A Chica.   

Abstract

Computational protein design (CPD) is a useful tool for protein engineers. It has been successfully applied towards the creation of proteins with increased thermostability, improved binding affinity, novel enzymatic activity, and altered ligand specificity. Traditionally, CPD calculations search and rank sequences using a single fixed protein backbone template in an approach referred to as single-state design (SSD). While SSD has enjoyed considerable success, certain design objectives require the explicit consideration of multiple conformational and/or chemical states. Cases where a "multistate" approach may be advantageous over the SSD approach include designing conformational changes into proteins, using native ensembles to mimic backbone flexibility, and designing ligand or oligomeric association specificities. These design objectives can be efficiently tackled using multistate design (MSD), an emerging methodology in CPD that considers any number of protein conformational or chemical states as inputs instead of a single protein backbone template, as in SSD. In this review article, recent examples of the successful design of a desired property into proteins using MSD are described. These studies employing MSD are divided into two categories--those that utilized multiple conformational states, and those that utilized multiple chemical states. In addition, the scoring of competing states during negative design is discussed as a current challenge for MSD.
Copyright © 2012 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22811394      PMCID: PMC3631354          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  53 in total

1.  Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway.

Authors:  S Nauli; B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition.

Authors:  James J Havranek; Pehr B Harbury
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-01

3.  Predicting resistance mutations using protein design algorithms.

Authors:  Kathleen M Frey; Ivelin Georgiev; Bruce R Donald; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction.

Authors:  Justin B Siegel; Alexandre Zanghellini; Helena M Lovick; Gert Kiss; Abigail R Lambert; Jennifer L St Clair; Jasmine L Gallaher; Donald Hilvert; Michael H Gelb; Barry L Stoddard; Kendall N Houk; Forrest E Michael; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Design of a heterospecific, tetrameric, 21-residue miniprotein with mixed alpha/beta structure.

Authors:  Mayssam H Ali; Christina M Taylor; Gevorg Grigoryan; Karen N Allen; Barbara Imperiali; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances.

Authors:  Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Full-sequence computational design and solution structure of a thermostable protein variant.

Authors:  Premal S Shah; Geoffrey K Hom; Scott A Ross; Jonathan Kyle Lassila; Karin A Crowhurst; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability.

Authors:  Gregory D Friedland; Anthony J Linares; Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-11       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Trapping moving targets with small molecules.

Authors:  Gregory M Lee; Charles S Craik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  21 in total

1.  Optimization of rotamers prior to template minimization improves stability predictions made by computational protein design.

Authors:  James A Davey; Roberto A Chica
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Computationally optimized deimmunization libraries yield highly mutated enzymes with low immunogenicity and enhanced activity.

Authors:  Regina S Salvat; Deeptak Verma; Andrew S Parker; Jack R Kirsch; Seth A Brooks; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Increasing the affinity of selective bZIP-binding peptides through surface residue redesign.

Authors:  Jenifer B Kaplan; Aaron W Reinke; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  comets (Constrained Optimization of Multistate Energies by Tree Search): A Provable and Efficient Protein Design Algorithm to Optimize Binding Affinity and Specificity with Respect to Sequence.

Authors:  Mark A Hallen; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 5.  Engineered control of enzyme structural dynamics and function.

Authors:  David D Boehr; Rebecca N D'Amico; Kathleen F O'Rourke
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Computational Design of Miniprotein Binders.

Authors:  Younes Bouchiba; Manon Ruffini; Thomas Schiex; Sophie Barbe
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Computationally Designed Bispecific Antibodies using Negative State Repertoires.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Karen J Froning; Shane Atwell; Hector Aldaz; Anna Pustilnik; Frances Lu; Flora Huang; Richard Yuan; Saleema Hassanali; Aaron K Chamberlain; Jonathan R Fitchett; Stephen J Demarest; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Computational design of a modular protein sense-response system.

Authors:  Anum A Glasgow; Yao-Ming Huang; Daniel J Mandell; Michael Thompson; Ryan Ritterson; Amanda L Loshbaugh; Jenna Pellegrino; Cody Krivacic; Roland A Pache; Kyle A Barlow; Noah Ollikainen; Deborah Jeon; Mark J S Kelly; James S Fraser; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Conservation of flexible residue clusters among structural and functional enzyme homologues.

Authors:  Donald Gagné; Laurie-Anne Charest; Sébastien Morin; Evgenii L Kovrigin; Nicolas Doucet
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Step-by-step design of proteins for small molecule interaction: A review on recent milestones.

Authors:  José M Pereira; Maria Vieira; Sérgio M Santos
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.