Andrew W Gardner1, Donald E Parker, Sowmya Krishnan, Laura J Chalmers. 1. CMRI Diabetes and Metabolic Research Program, Harold Hamm Diabetes Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA. andrew-gardner@ouhsc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSES: To compare daily ambulatory measures in children, adolescents, and young adults with and without metabolic syndrome and to assess which metabolic syndrome components, demographic measures, and body composition measures are associated with daily ambulatory measures. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty subjects between the ages of 10 and 30 yr were assessed on metabolic syndrome components, demographic and clinical measures, body fat percentage, and daily ambulatory strides, durations, and cadences during seven consecutive days. Of the 250 subjects, 45 had metabolic syndrome, as defined by the International Diabetes Federation. RESULTS: Subjects with metabolic syndrome ambulated at a slower daily average cadence than those without metabolic syndrome (13.6 ± 2.2 vs 14.9 ± 3.2 strides per minute; P = 0.012), and they had slower cadences for continuous durations of 60 min (P = 0.006), 30 min (P = 0.005), 20 min (P = 0.003), 5 min (P = 0.002), and 1 min (P = 0.001). However, the total amount of time spent ambulating each day was not different (P = 0.077). After adjustment for metabolic syndrome status, average cadence is linearly associated with body fat percentage (P < 0.001) and fat mass (P < 0.01). Group difference in average cadence was no longer significant after adjusting for body fat percentage (P = 0.683) and fat mass (P = 0.973). CONCLUSIONS: Children, adolescents, and young adults with metabolic syndrome ambulate more slowly and take fewer strides throughout the day than those without metabolic syndrome, although the total amount of time spent ambulating is not different. Furthermore, the detrimental influence of metabolic syndrome on ambulatory cadence is primarily a function of body fatness.
PURPOSES: To compare daily ambulatory measures in children, adolescents, and young adults with and without metabolic syndrome and to assess which metabolic syndrome components, demographic measures, and body composition measures are associated with daily ambulatory measures. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty subjects between the ages of 10 and 30 yr were assessed on metabolic syndrome components, demographic and clinical measures, body fat percentage, and daily ambulatory strides, durations, and cadences during seven consecutive days. Of the 250 subjects, 45 had metabolic syndrome, as defined by the International Diabetes Federation. RESULTS: Subjects with metabolic syndrome ambulated at a slower daily average cadence than those without metabolic syndrome (13.6 ± 2.2 vs 14.9 ± 3.2 strides per minute; P = 0.012), and they had slower cadences for continuous durations of 60 min (P = 0.006), 30 min (P = 0.005), 20 min (P = 0.003), 5 min (P = 0.002), and 1 min (P = 0.001). However, the total amount of time spent ambulating each day was not different (P = 0.077). After adjustment for metabolic syndrome status, average cadence is linearly associated with body fat percentage (P < 0.001) and fat mass (P < 0.01). Group difference in average cadence was no longer significant after adjusting for body fat percentage (P = 0.683) and fat mass (P = 0.973). CONCLUSIONS:Children, adolescents, and young adults with metabolic syndrome ambulate more slowly and take fewer strides throughout the day than those without metabolic syndrome, although the total amount of time spent ambulating is not different. Furthermore, the detrimental influence of metabolic syndrome on ambulatory cadence is primarily a function of body fatness.
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Darren E R Warburton; Ian Janssen; Donald H Paterson; Amy E Latimer; Ryan E Rhodes; Michelle E Kho; Audrey Hicks; Allana G Leblanc; Lori Zehr; Kelly Murumets; Mary Duggan Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: David E Laaksonen; Hanna-Maaria Lakka; Leo K Niskanen; George A Kaplan; Jukka T Salonen; Timo A Lakka Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: June Stevens; David M Murray; Chris D Baggett; John P Elder; Timothy G Lohman; Leslie A Lytle; Russell R Pate; Charlotte A Pratt; Margarita S Treuth; Larry S Webber; Deborah R Young Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-09-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Michael W Beets; Sarahjane Belton; Greet M Cardon; Scott Duncan; Yoshiro Hatano; David R Lubans; Timothy S Olds; Anders Raustorp; David A Rowe; John C Spence; Shigeho Tanaka; Steven N Blair Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Andy R Ness; Sam D Leary; Calum Mattocks; Steven N Blair; John J Reilly; Jonathan Wells; Sue Ingle; Kate Tilling; George Davey Smith; Chris Riddoch Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Francisco Mardones; Pilar Arnaiz; Paz Pacheco; Angelica Dominguez; Luis Villarroel; Johan G Eriksson; Salesa Barja; Marcelo Farías; Oscar Castillo Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; Ho Han; Elroy J Aguiar; Tiago V Barreira; John M Schuna; Minsoo Kang; David A Rowe Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 13.800