Alyssa Majesko1, Seo Yeon Hong, Lisa Weissfeld, Douglas B White. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Although acting as a surrogate decision maker can be highly distressing for some family members of intensive care unit patients, little is known about whether there are modifiable risk factors for the occurrence of such difficulties. OBJECTIVES: To identify: 1) factors associated with lower levels of confidence among family members to function as surrogates and 2) whether the quality of clinician-family communication is associated with the timing of decisions to forego life support. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 230 surrogate decision makers for incapacitated, mechanically ventilated patients at high risk of death in four intensive care units at University of California San Francisco Medical Center from 2006 to 2007. Surrogates completed a questionnaire addressing their perceived ability to act as a surrogate and the quality of their communication with physicians. We used clustered multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of low levels of perceived ability to act as a surrogate and a Cox proportional hazard model to determine whether quality of communication was associated with the timing of decisions to withdraw life support. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in family members' confidence to act as surrogate decision makers, with 27% rating their perceived ability as 7 or lower on a 10-point scale. Independent predictors of lower role confidence were the lack of prior experience as a surrogate (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval [1.04-4.46], p=.04), no prior discussions with the patient about treatment preferences (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval [1.79-7.76], p<.001), and poor quality of communication with the ICU physician (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval [1.09-1.35] p<.001). Higher quality physician-family communication was associated with a significantly shorter duration of life-sustaining treatment among patients who died (β=0.11, p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Family members without prior experience as a surrogate and those who had not engaged in advanced discussions with the patient about treatment preferences were at higher risk to report less confidence in carrying out the surrogate role. Better-quality clinician-family communication was associated with both more confidence among family members to act as surrogates and a shorter duration of use of life support among patients who died.
UNLABELLED: Although acting as a surrogate decision maker can be highly distressing for some family members of intensive care unit patients, little is known about whether there are modifiable risk factors for the occurrence of such difficulties. OBJECTIVES: To identify: 1) factors associated with lower levels of confidence among family members to function as surrogates and 2) whether the quality of clinician-family communication is associated with the timing of decisions to forego life support. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 230 surrogate decision makers for incapacitated, mechanically ventilated patients at high risk of death in four intensive care units at University of California San Francisco Medical Center from 2006 to 2007. Surrogates completed a questionnaire addressing their perceived ability to act as a surrogate and the quality of their communication with physicians. We used clustered multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of low levels of perceived ability to act as a surrogate and a Cox proportional hazard model to determine whether quality of communication was associated with the timing of decisions to withdraw life support. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in family members' confidence to act as surrogate decision makers, with 27% rating their perceived ability as 7 or lower on a 10-point scale. Independent predictors of lower role confidence were the lack of prior experience as a surrogate (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval [1.04-4.46], p=.04), no prior discussions with the patient about treatment preferences (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval [1.79-7.76], p<.001), and poor quality of communication with the ICU physician (odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval [1.09-1.35] p<.001). Higher quality physician-family communication was associated with a significantly shorter duration of life-sustaining treatment among patients who died (β=0.11, p=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Family members without prior experience as a surrogate and those who had not engaged in advanced discussions with the patient about treatment preferences were at higher risk to report less confidence in carrying out the surrogate role. Better-quality clinician-family communication was associated with both more confidence among family members to act as surrogates and a shorter duration of use of life support among patients who died.
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Barbara J Daly; Sara L Douglas; Elizabeth O'Toole; Nahida H Gordon; Rana Hejal; Joel Peerless; James Rowbottom; Allan Garland; Craig Lilly; Clareen Wiencek; Ronald Hickman Journal: Chest Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Karin T Kirchhoff; Lee Walker; Ann Hutton; Vicki Spuhler; Beth Vaughan Cole; Terry Clemmer Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Elizabeth K Vig; Janelle S Taylor; Helene Starks; Elizabeth K Hopley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Enrique Machare Delgado; Amy Callahan; Galia Paganelli; Barbara Reville; Susan M Parks; Paul E Marik Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Leah R Evans; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Latifat Apatira; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daniel P Sulmasy; Mark T Hughes; Gayane Yenokyan; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Alan B Astrow; Julie A Johnson; Grace Ho; Marie T Nolan Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Bradley D Freeman; Kevin Butler; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian R Clarridge; Carie R Kennedy; Jessica LeBlanc; Sara Chandros Hull Journal: Chest Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Xuemei Cai; Jennifer Robinson; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Douglas B White; Robert G Holloway; Kevin N Sheth; Liana Fraenkel; David Y Hwang Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Kianna Montz; Siu L Hui; James E Slaven; Christopher M Callahan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Lingsheng Li; Judith E Nelson; Laura C Hanson; Christopher E Cox; Shannon S Carson; Emily J Chai; Kristine L Keller; James A Tulsky; Marion Danis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jeffrey R Johnson; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Erin K Kross; Nicholas L Smith; Julie C Hanada; Sean K Doll O'Mahoney; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ellen Iverson; Aaron Celious; Carie R Kennedy; Erica Shehane; Alexander Eastman; Victoria Warren; Bradley D Freeman Journal: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 3.072