Literature DB >> 22494262

A comparison of multiscale methods for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.

Noah C Benson1, Valerie Daggett.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) is the only technique available for obtaining dynamic protein data at atomic spatial resolution and picosecond or finer temporal resolution. In recent years, the cost of computational resources has decreased exponentially while the number of known protein structures, many of which are not characterized biochemically, has increased rapidly. These events have led to an increase in the use of MD in biological research, both to examine phenomena that cannot be resolved experimentally and to generate hypotheses that direct further experimental research. In fact, several databases of MD simulations have arisen in recent years. MD simulations, and especially MD simulation databases, contain massive amounts of data, yet interesting phenomena often occur over very short time periods and on the scale of only a few atoms. Analysis of such data must balance these fine-detail events with the global picture they create. Here, we address the multiscale nature of the problem by comparing several MD analysis methods to show their strengths and weaknesses at various scales using the wild-type and R282W mutant forms of the DNA-binding domain of protein p53. By leveraging these techniques together, we are able to pinpoint fine-detail and big picture differences between the protein's variants. Our analyses indicate that the R282W mutation of p53 destabilizes the L1 loop and loosens the H2 helix conformation, but the loosened L1 loop can be rescued by residue H115, preventing the R282W mutation from completely destabilizing the protein or abolishing activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22494262      PMCID: PMC3406285          DOI: 10.1021/jp302103t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  26 in total

Review 1.  Wavelets in bioinformatics and computational biology: state of art and perspectives.

Authors:  Pietro Liò
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Methods for molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding/unfolding in solution.

Authors:  David A C Beck; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Automated Event Detection and Activity Monitoring in Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Willy Wriggers; Kate A Stafford; Yibing Shan; Stefano Piana; Paul Maragakis; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Patrick J Miller; Justin Gullingsrud; Charles A Rendleman; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Dynameomics: large-scale assessment of native protein flexibility.

Authors:  Noah C Benson; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  A subset of tumor-derived mutant forms of p53 down-regulate p63 and p73 through a direct interaction with the p53 core domain.

Authors:  C Gaiddon; M Lokshin; J Ahn; T Zhang; C Prives
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Structural effects of the L145Q, V157F, and R282W cancer-associated mutations in the p53 DNA-binding core domain.

Authors:  Sara Calhoun; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Quantitative analysis of residual folding and DNA binding in mutant p53 core domain: definition of mutant states for rescue in cancer therapy.

Authors:  A N Bullock; J Henckel; A R Fersht
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Using networks to identify fine structural differences between functionally distinct protein states.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Structure-function-rescue: the diverse nature of common p53 cancer mutants.

Authors:  A C Joerger; A R Fersht
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  23 in total

1.  C(α) torsion angles as a flexible criterion to extract secrets from a molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  gRINN: a tool for calculation of residue interaction energies and protein energy network analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Onur Serçinoglu; Pemra Ozbek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  QM-MM simulations on p53-DNA complex: a study of hot spot and rescue mutants.

Authors:  Shruti Koulgi; Archana Achalere; Neeru Sharma; Uddhavesh Sonavane; Rajendra Joshi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Computational and Biological Evaluation of β-Adrenoreceptor Blockers as Promising Bacterial Anti-Virulence Agents.

Authors:  Ahmad J Almalki; Tarek S Ibrahim; Sameh S Elhady; Wael A H Hegazy; Khaled M Darwish
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

5.  Hidden electrostatic energy contributions define dynamic allosteric communications within p53 during molecular recognition.

Authors:  Sayan Bhattacharjee; Jayati Sengupta
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.699

6.  Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles.

Authors:  Matthew Carter Childers; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Investigating the structure-activity relationship of marine natural polyketides as promising SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Amr El-Demerdash; Ahmed A Al-Karmalawy; Tarek Mohamed Abdel-Aziz; Sameh S Elhady; Khaled M Darwish; Ahmed H E Hassan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  β-Blockers bearing hydroxyethylamine and hydroxyethylene as potential SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors: rational based design, in silico, in vitro, and SAR studies for lead optimization.

Authors:  Mohammed I A Hamed; Khaled M Darwish; Raya Soltane; Amani Chrouda; Ahmed Mostafa; Noura M Abo Shama; Sameh S Elhady; Hamada S Abulkhair; Ahmed E Khodir; Ayman Abo Elmaaty; Ahmed A Al-Karmalawy
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  Combining multi-scale modelling methods to decipher molecular motions of a branching sucrase from glycoside-hydrolase family 70.

Authors:  Akli Ben Imeddourene; Jérémy Esque; Isabelle André
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mapping the structural and dynamical features of multiple p53 DNA binding domains: insights into loop 1 intrinsic dynamics.

Authors:  Suryani Lukman; David P Lane; Chandra S Verma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.