| Literature DB >> 22809326 |
Sonja Wilke1, Joern Krausze, Konrad Büssow.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: The family of lysosome-associated membrane proteins (LAMP) comprises the multifunctional, ubiquitous <span class="Gene">LAMP-1 and LAMP-2, and the cell type-specific proteins DC-LAMP (LAMP-3), BAD-LAMP (UNC-46, C20orf103) and macrosialin (CD68). LAMPs have been implicated in a multitude of cellular processes, including phagocytosis, autophagy, lipid transport and aging. LAMP-2 isoform A acts as a receptor in chaperone-mediated autophagy. LAMP-2 deficiency causes the fatal Danon disease. The abundant proteins LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 are major constituents of the glycoconjugate coat present on the inside of the lysosomal membrane, the 'lysosomal glycocalyx'. The LAMP family is characterized by a conserved domain of 150 to 200 amino acids with two disulfide bonds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22809326 PMCID: PMC3409847 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-62
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Figure 1The LAMP protein family. (A) Domain architectures of the five human LAMP family proteins (UniProt P11279, P13473, Q9UQV4, Q9UJQ1, P34810). O- and N-linked glycosylation sites are indicated in blue and red, respectively. SP, signal peptide; TM, transmembrane helix. (B, C) Sequence alignments of the seven human LAMP domains and adjacent transmembrane domains (B) and of the 'hinge' region (linker) connecting the membrane-distal ('dist') and membrane-proximal ('prox') domains of LAMP-1 and LAMP-2 (C). Glycosylated residues are displayed with yellow background. Residues involved in β-bulges are indicated by arcs in magenta. Hydrophobic residues are colored red and hydrophilic ones are colored blue (in B). S-S: disulfide bond.
Data collection and refinement statistics.
| Data collection | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beamline | DESY X12 | ||
| Temperature (K) | 100 | ||
| Dataset type | Peak | Inflection point | High-energy remote |
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.10371 | 1.10420 | 1.10009 |
| Data range (°) | 180 | ||
| Oscillation range (°) | 0.5 | ||
| Space group | P31 | ||
| Unit cell parameters (Å) | a = b = 53.0, c = 143.5 | ||
| Resolution (Å) | 20 to 2.8 (2.95 to 2.8) | ||
| Unique reflections | 19,800 (3,352) | 19,790 (3,392) | 19,765 (3,365) |
| Redundancy | 2.84 (2.84) | 2.83 (2.82) | 2.84 (2.84) |
| Completeness (%) | 90.0 (94.5) | 89.9 (96.9) | 89.7 (95.9) |
| Mean I/σI | 16.5 (3.45) | 15.52 (2.92) | 18.19 (3.84) |
| | 0.05 (0.30) | 0.06 (0.40) | 0.05 (0.28) |
| Mosaicity (°) | 0.271 | ||
| Estimated Wilson | 54.1 | ||
| | 0.2271 | ||
| | 0.2508 | ||
| Molecules in the asymmetric unit | 2/2/4 | ||
| No. of atoms | |||
| Protein | 2,438 | ||
| Hetero atoms | 32 | ||
| Water | 10 | ||
| Total | 2,480 | ||
| Atomic displacement factor | 61.3 | ||
| Real space correlation coefficientd | 0.882 | ||
| r.m.s.d. from ideal | |||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.0056 | ||
| Bond angles (°) | 1.023 | ||
| Ramachandran plot | |||
| Favored (%) | 90.9 | ||
| Allowed (%) | 6.8 | ||
| Disallowed (%) | 2.3 | ||
Values in parentheses account for the highest resolution shell.
a
b
c Ris calculated as Rbut using Fderived from 5% randomly selected reflections exclude from refinement.
d
Figure 2The structure of the DC-LAMP domain. (A) Different views of the domain's shape. The two β-sheets are drawn in red and blue. (B) Stereo views of the domain's β-prism shape. Schematic prism shapes are drawn on the right for orientation. The N-acetyl-glucosamine residue is depicted as a stick drawing in cyan.
Figure 3The β-strand arrangement of the DC-LAMP domain. The 'front' and 'back' β-sheets are drawn in red and blue, respectively. The cysteines that form the first disulfide bond (S-S) are labelled. β-strands and loops are identified as S1 to S11 and L1 to L3, respectively. The topology of the β-sheets is drawn schematically in the lower part with sheets opened out.
Figure 4Stereo views of the β-bulges. The β-bulges that bend the front and back β-sheets are shown. Main chain atoms of parts of β-strands are shown as stick drawings. Bulged residues are numbered and their conformations are given in parentheses (α, α-helix; β, β-strand; I', type I' β-turn; Lα, left-handed α-helix). Hydrogen bond pairs that flank β-bulges are shown in red and the corresponding residues are labelled. Other inter-main chain hydrogen bonds are drawn in grey.
Figure 5The hydrophobic pocket and the variable loop conformation. (A) The hydrophobic pocket in the DC-LAMP domain was filled with water molecules, which are displayed as a red surface, using HOLLOW [70]. (B) Structural alignment of DC-LAMP chain A (grey) and B (blue). Hydrogen bonds connect loop L1 to an adjacent hairpin in chain A, but not in chain B. (C) A VH immunoglobulin domain is shown for comparison (PDB 1IGT). Complementarity determining regions (CDR) are drawn as red loops. The two β-sheets of the domain, displayed in green and blue, are connected by a disulfide bond (S-S).
Figure 6Model of lysosomal membrane proteins and the glycoprotein coat. Structural models of glycosylated DC-LAMP and LAMP-1 were drawn to scale. The models are based on the DC-LAMP crystal structure and a hypothetical in silico model of LAMP-1. The thickness of the glycoprotein coat was reported to range from 5 to 12 nm with an average of 8 nm. The membrane-distal, N-terminal domain of LAMP-1 may adopt other positions. Dotted lines indicate putative binding sites consisting of the flexible loop L1 and an adjacent β-hairpin (Figure 5B). A box corresponding to 120 nm2 surface area was drawn around a top view of LAMP-1. Polypeptides are depicted in green and glycans in yellow.
Figure 7Molecular modeling. (A) The structure of the lowest energy obtained by molecular dynamics simulation is shown as a stick model and a van der Waals surface with pink carbon atoms. Glycans are shown with yellow carbon atoms. Prolines 203 and 206 have α-helical conformations. (B) Radius of gyration values during the simulation and r.m.s. deviations of the backbone atoms from the structure of lowest energy (marked in red). The peptide's lowest-energy structure had a radius of gyration of 14.6 Å, compared to 17.9 Å for the initial structure.