Literature DB >> 22807975

Impact of third-line treatment with irinotecan plus cetuximab on non-tumor standardized uptake values in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Kim Francis Andersen1, Kristin Skougaard, Anne Lerberg Nielsen, Helle Westergren Hendel.   

Abstract

The correct interpretation of metabolic response in cancer cells to therapy requires knowledge of how tumor-free tissue responds to the same treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate standardized uptake values (SUVs) in tumor-free regions of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer prior to and following therapy, via the use of 18-fluoride fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). On baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scans (n=51), volumes of interest (VOI) were obtained from tumor-free tissue (aortic arch, liver and spleen) and SUVs normalized to total body mass were registered. The procedure was repeated for a follow-up scan two weeks following a single administration of the third-line treatment with irinotecan plus cetuximab. The mean differences in SUV prior to and following therapy were non-significant (P>0.05) in all the registered tumor-free regions. Correlation coefficients indicated a significant result between the variables (0.74-0.84; P<0.001). This study suggests that the early assessment of metabolic response may be made following the administration of third-line therapy with irinotecan plus cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to second-line treatment with irinotecan.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807975      PMCID: PMC3398380          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  18 in total

1.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

Authors:  S C Huang
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  18F-FDG PET as a candidate for "qualified biomarker": functional assessment of treatment response in oncology.

Authors:  Steven M Larson; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.

Authors:  Lalitha K Shankar; John M Hoffman; Steve Bacharach; Michael M Graham; Joel Karp; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Steven Larson; David A Mankoff; Barry A Siegel; Annick Van den Abbeele; Jeffrey Yap; Daniel Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability of standardized uptake value measurements in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edith M Marom; Reginald F Munden; Mylene T Truong; Gregory W Gladish; Donald A Podoloff; Osama Mawlawi; Lyle D Broemeling; John F Bruzzi; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-15

8.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008.

Authors:  J Ferlay; D M Parkin; E Steliarova-Foucher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  1 in total

1.  The preoperative SUVmax for (18)F-FDG uptake predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Debing Shi; Guoxiang Cai; Junjie Peng; Dawei Li; Xinxiang Li; Ye Xu; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.