Literature DB >> 22806936

Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Jack Cuzick1, J Thomas Cox, Guili Zhang, Mark H Einstein, Mark Stoler, Suzanne Trupin, Catherine M Behrens.   

Abstract

Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) is a common cytologic finding in cervical screening, yet only about 10-20% have significant histologic abnormalities and these are almost always positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). This analysis aims to clarify the role of hrHPV DNA testing in the triage of women with LSIL cytology. In the ATHENA screening trial, we examined 1,084 cases of LSIL, of which 925 had an evaluable biopsy, to determine the extent to which hrHPV testing can identify those patients who have precursor lesions in need of immediate clinical referral and those who have changes more likely to regress spontaneously. Overall, 71.2% of LSIL cases were hrHPV positive, but the prevalence was age dependent, with only 56.1% in women ≥ 40 years. Among women with LSIL, 11.6% (107/925) had a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) histologic diagnosis and, of these, only nine were hrHPV negative. For CIN3+, 91.7% (44/48) of women with LSIL were hrHPV positive. The negative predictive value of hrHPV testing for CIN3+ in LSIL was 100% for women aged ≥ 40 years. Women who were HPV16 positive had a higher positive predictive value for CIN2+ (25.4%) than those who were positive for 12 other pooled hrHPV types (11.5%). Testing for hrHPV in women with LSIL is effective in identifying high-grade cervical lesions, thereby avoiding unnecessary referrals to colposcopy and potential over-treatment of non-progressive lesions, especially for women aged ≥ 40 years.
Copyright © 2012 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806936     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

1.  Novel epigenetic changes in CDKN2A are associated with progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  N Ari Wijetunga; Thomas J Belbin; Robert D Burk; Kathleen Whitney; Maria Abadi; John M Greally; Mark H Einstein; Nicolas F Schlecht
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Human papillomavirus testing 2007-2012: co-testing and triage utilization and impact on subsequent clinical management.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Orrin Myers; William C Hunt; Debbie Saslow; Philip E Castle; Walter Kinney; Alan Waxman; Michael Robertson; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  HPV genotyping for triage of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Koji Matsumoto; Toyomi Satoh; Ken Nishide; Akiko Nozue; Koji Shimabukuro; Seiichi Endo; Kimihiro Nagai; Akinori Oki; Hiroyuki Ochi; Yukio Morishita; Masayuki Noguchi; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of CINtec PLUS cytology and cobas HPV test for triaging Canadian patients with LSIL cytology referred to colposcopy: A two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Laura Gilbert; Sam Ratnam; Dan Jang; Reza Alaghehbandan; Miranda Schell; Rob Needle; Anne Ecobichon-Morris; Arnav Wadhawan; Dustin Costescu; Laurie Elit; Peter Wang; George Zahariadis; Max Chernesky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus-16/18 genotyping in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Warner K Huh; Erin Williams; Joice Huang; Tommy Bramley; Nick Poulios
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.