| Literature DB >> 22806747 |
Loveness K Nyanga1, Martinus J R Nout, Eddy J Smid, Teun Boekhout, Marcel H Zwietering.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of two low-cost, low technology traditional methods for drying starter cultures with standard lyophilisation. Lyophilised yeast cultures and yeast cultures preserved in dry rice cakes and dry plant fibre strands were examined for viable cell counts during 6 months storage at 4 and 25 °C. None of the yeast cultures showed a significant loss in viable cell count during 6 months of storage at 4 °C upon lyophilisation and preservation in dry rice cakes. During storage at 25 °C in the dark, yeast cultures preserved in dry rice cakes, and lyophilised cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Issatchenkia orientalis showed no significant loss of viable cells up to 4 months of storage. Yeast cultures preserved in dry plant fibre strands had the greatest loss of viable count during the 6 months of storage at 25 °C. Preservation of yeasts cultures in dry rice cakes provided better survival during storage at 4 °C than lyophilisation. The current study demonstrated that traditional methods can be useful and effective for starter culture preservation in small-scale, low-tech applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22806747 PMCID: PMC3465650 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-012-1118-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0959-3993 Impact factor: 3.312
Fig. 1Log reduction in viable counts of each yeast species in lyophilised (a) and dry rice cake (b) cultures during 6 months storage at 4 °C, S. cerevisiae (38), S. cerevisiae (153), I. orientalis (129) and, S. fibuligera (66)
Estimated D values (months) of yeast strains preserved by lyophilisation, in dry rice cakes and dry fibre strands stored at 4 and 25 °C
| Preservation method and yeast strains | Storage temperature | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Strain no. | 4 °C | 25 °C | |
| Lyophilised | |||
| | 38 | 10 ± 0.7a2 | 4 ± 0.6a |
| | 153 | 8 ± 0.96b | 4 ± 0.11a |
| | 129 | 10 ± 0.47a | 3 ± 0.31b |
| | 66 | 9 ± 1.02c | 3 ± 0.01b |
| Dry rice cakes | |||
| | 38 | 33 ± 1.91d | 5 ± 1.43d |
| | 153 | 28 ± 1.42e | 5 ± 1.68d |
| | 129 | 31 ± 1.66f | 4 ± 0.98e |
| | 66 | 40 ± 1.96i | 5 ± 0.87d |
| Dry plant fibre strands | |||
| | 38 | ND | 2 ± 0.0f |
| | 153 | ND | 2 ± 0.09f |
| | 129 | ND | 2 ± 0.15f |
| | 66 | ND | 2 ± 0.0f |
1D values ± standard deviation shown are means of two replicate experiments, the enumeration was done in duplicate
2Means in the same column with same letter are not significantly different according to the LSD at 0.05 level
ND not determined
Fig. 2Log reduction in viable count of each yeast species in lyophilised (a), dry rice cake (b) and dry plant fibre strand (c) cultures during 6 months storage at 25 °C, S. cerevisiae (38), S. cerevisiae (153), I. orientalis (129) and, S. fibuligera (66)