Literature DB >> 22806661

Modeling body state-dependent multisensory integration.

Martin V Butz1, Anna Belardinelli, Stephan Ehrenfeld.   

Abstract

The brain often integrates multisensory sources of information in a way that is close to the optimal according to Bayesian principles. Since sensory modalities are grounded in different, body-relative frames of reference, multisensory integration requires accurate transformations of information. We have shown experimentally, for example, that a rotating tactile stimulus on the palm of the right hand can influence the judgment of ambiguously rotating visual displays. Most significantly, this influence depended on the palm orientation: when facing upwards, a clockwise rotation on the palm yielded a clockwise visual judgment bias; when facing downwards, the same clockwise rotation yielded a counterclockwise bias. Thus, tactile rotation cues biased visual rotation judgment in a head-centered reference frame. Recently, we have generated a modular, multimodal arm model that is able to mimic aspects of such experiments. The model co-represents the state of an arm in several modalities, including a proprioceptive, joint angle modality as well as head-centered orientation and location modalities. Each modality represents each limb or joint separately. Sensory information from the different modalities is exchanged via local forward and inverse kinematic mappings. Also, re-afferent sensory feedback is anticipated and integrated via Kalman filtering. Information across modalities is integrated probabilistically via Bayesian-based plausibility estimates, continuously maintaining a consistent global arm state estimation. This architecture is thus able to model the described effect of posture-dependent motion cue integration: tactile and proprioceptive sensory information may yield top-down biases on visual processing. Equally, such information may influence top-down visual attention, expecting particular arm-dependent motion patterns. Current research implements such effects on visual processing and attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806661     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0471-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  10 in total

1.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

2.  A short history of ideo-motor action.

Authors:  Armin Stock; Claudia Stock
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-18

3.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Importance of head axes in perception of cutaneous patterns drawn on vertical body surfaces.

Authors:  K Sekiyama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

5.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Roland Thomaschke; Matthias J Linhardt; Oliver Herbort
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael Graziano
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecture.

Authors:  Martin V Butz; Oliver Herbort; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  The spatial characteristics of tactile form perception.

Authors:  S R Oldfield; J R Phillips
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2004-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.