Literature DB >> 22806650

The role of attention in the affordance effect: can we afford to ignore it?

Kiril Kostov1, Armina Janyan.   

Abstract

It has been established that the task-irrelevant orientation of an object's graspable handle produces a stimulus-response compatibility effect, resulting in faster reaction times when the location of the response corresponds to that of the object's handle. There is ongoing debate whether to attribute this affordance effect to motoric or to attentional components. In an attempt to reconcile these two viewpoints, we employed a novel experimental approach for investigating the relationship between attention and affordance. Using 3-D positional sound, auditory spatial attention was manipulated in order to explore its effects on affordance. Subjects were presented images of everyday graspable objects and had to respond bimanually (left or right) whether the object (featuring a leftward or rightward handle) was presented upright or upside-down. Prior to each affording object, sound localization cues were manipulated so as to orient auditory attention to the left, or to the right of the interaural axis (control). We obtained a peculiar pattern of results, which not only appears to provide support for an attention-shift account of affordance but does so in a cross-modal context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806650     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0452-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  9 in total

1.  Attentional processes link perception and action.

Authors:  Stephen J Anderson; Noriko Yamagishi; Vivian Karavia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part?

Authors:  Dongbin Tobin Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Cristina Iani; Elena Gherri; Fabio Benatti; Sandro Rubichi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-10-01

4.  Asymmetries in motor attention during a cued bimanual reaching task: left and right handers compared.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Julie C Main; David P Carey
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

6.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift.

Authors:  S Rubichi; R Nicoletti; C Iani; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Riggio; I Dascola; C Umiltá
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Reversing the affordance effect: negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with images of graspable objects.

Authors:  Kiril Kostov; Armina Janyan
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

2.  The role of executive control in the activation of manual affordances.

Authors:  Nikolay Dagaev; Yury Shtyrov; Andriy Myachykov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.

Authors:  Marianna Ambrosecchia; Barbara F M Marino; Luiz G Gawryszewski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components.

Authors:  Meytal Wilf; Nicholas P Holmes; Isabella Schwartz; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-04

6.  Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice.

Authors:  Mikhail Pokhoday; Christoph Scheepers; Yury Shtyrov; Andriy Myachykov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.