Literature DB >> 21433305

Effects of habitat light intensity on mammalian eye shape.

Carrie C Veilleux1, Rebecca J Lewis.   

Abstract

Many aspects of mammalian visual anatomy vary with activity pattern, reflecting the divergent selective pressures imposed by low light and high light visual environments. However, ambient light intensity can also differ substantially between and within habitats due to differences in foliage density. We explored the effects of interhabitat and intrahabitat variation in light intensity on mammalian visual anatomy. Data on relative cornea size, activity pattern, and habitat type were collected from the literature for 209 terrestrial mammal species. In general, mammalian relative cornea size significantly varied by habitat type. In within-order and across-mammal analyses, diurnal and cathemeral mammals from forested habitats exhibited relatively larger corneas than species from more open habitats, reflecting an adaptation to increase visual sensitivity in forest species. However, in all analyses, we found no habitat-type effect in nocturnal species, suggesting that nocturnal mammals may experience selection to maximize visual sensitivity across all habitats. We also examined whether vertical strata usage affected relative cornea size in anthropoid primates. In most analyses, species occupying lower levels of forests and woodlands did not exhibit relatively larger corneas than species utilizing higher levels. Thus, unlike differences in intensity between habitat types, differences in light intensity between vertical forest strata do not appear to exert a strong selective pressure on visual morphology. These results suggest that terrestrial mammal visual systems reflect specializations for habitat variation in light intensity, and that habitat type as well as activity pattern have influenced mammalian visual evolution.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21433305     DOI: 10.1002/ar.21368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  6 in total

1.  Ecomorphology of eye shape and retinal topography in waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes: Anatidae) with different foraging modes.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Karyn Stecyk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Brian K Schmidt; Jeremy R Corfield; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Interspecifc variation in eye shape and retinal topography in seven species of galliform bird (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae).

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Mischa V Bandet; Jeremy R Corfield; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Ecological constraints on sensory systems: compound eye size in Daphnia is reduced by resource limitation.

Authors:  Christopher S Brandon; Jeffry L Dudycha
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Species-specific differences in relative eye size are related to patterns of edge avoidance in an Amazonian rainforest bird community.

Authors:  Cristina Martínez-Ortega; Eduardo Sa Santos; Diego Gil
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Coordinated evolution of brain size, structure, and eye size in Trinidadian killifish.

Authors:  Kaitlyn J Howell; Shannon M Beston; Sara Stearns; Matthew R Walsh
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Does structural complexity determine the morphology of assemblages? An experimental test on three continents.

Authors:  Heloise Gibb; Catherine L Parr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.