Literature DB >> 22805318

3.5D dynamic PET image reconstruction incorporating kinetics-based clusters.

Lijun Lu1, Nicolas A Karakatsanis, Jing Tang, Wufan Chen, Arman Rahmim.   

Abstract

Standard 3D dynamic positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging consists of independent image reconstructions of individual frames followed by application of appropriate kinetic model to the time activity curves at the voxel or region-of-interest (ROI). The emerging field of 4D PET reconstruction, by contrast, seeks to move beyond this scheme and incorporate information from multiple frames within the image reconstruction task. Here we propose a novel reconstruction framework aiming to enhance quantitative accuracy of parametric images via introduction of priors based on voxel kinetics, as generated via clustering of preliminary reconstructed dynamic images to define clustered neighborhoods of voxels with similar kinetics. This is then followed by straightforward maximum a posteriori (MAP) 3D PET reconstruction as applied to individual frames; and as such the method is labeled '3.5D' image reconstruction. The use of cluster-based priors has the advantage of further enhancing quantitative performance in dynamic PET imaging, because: (a) there are typically more voxels in clusters than in conventional local neighborhoods, and (b) neighboring voxels with distinct kinetics are less likely to be clustered together. Using realistic simulated (11)C-raclopride dynamic PET data, the quantitative performance of the proposed method was investigated. Parametric distribution-volume (DV) and DV ratio (DVR) images were estimated from dynamic image reconstructions using (a) maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM), and MAP reconstructions using (b) the quadratic prior (QP-MAP), (c) the Green prior (GP-MAP) and (d, e) two proposed cluster-based priors (CP-U-MAP and CP-W-MAP), followed by graphical modeling, and were qualitatively and quantitatively compared for 11 ROIs. Overall, the proposed dynamic PET reconstruction methodology resulted in substantial visual as well as quantitative accuracy improvements (in terms of noise versus bias performance) for parametric DV and DVR images. The method was also tested on a 90 min (11)C-raclopride patient study performed on the high-resolution research tomography. The proposed method was shown to outperform the conventional method in visual as well as quantitative accuracy improvements (in terms of noise versus regional DVR value performance).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22805318      PMCID: PMC3445711          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/15/5035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  41 in total

1.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET.

Authors:  J Qi; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels.

Authors:  Claude Comtat; Paul E Kinahan; Jeffrey A Fessler; Thomas Beyer; David W Townsend; Michel Defrise; Christian Michel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A modified fuzzy C-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data.

Authors:  Mohamed N Ahmed; Sameh M Yamany; Nevin Mohamed; Aly A Farag; Thomas Moriarty
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Improved parametric image generation using spatial-temporal analysis of dynamic PET studies.

Authors:  Yun Zhou; Sung-Cheng Huang; Marvin Bergsneider; Dean F Wong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Fast formation of statistically reliable FDG parametric images based on clustering and principal components.

Authors:  Y Kimura; M Senda; N M Alpert
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Improved signal-to-noise ratio in parametric images by cluster analysis.

Authors:  Y Kimura; H Hsu; H Toyama; M Senda; N M Alpert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A new convex edge-preserving median prior with applications to tomography.

Authors:  Ing-Tsung Hsiao; Anand Rangarajan; Gene Gindi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Cluster analysis in kinetic modelling of the brain: a noninvasive alternative to arterial sampling.

Authors:  Matthew Liptrot; Karen H Adams; Lars Martiny; Lars H Pinborg; Markus N Lonsdale; Niels V Olsen; Søren Holm; Claus Svarer; Gitte M Knudsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Head and neck cancer: detection of recurrence with three-dimensional principal components analysis at dynamic FDG PET.

Authors:  Y Anzai; S Minoshima; G T Wolf; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy.

Authors:  Kristof Baete; Johan Nuyts; Wim Van Paesschen; Paul Suetens; Patrick Dupont
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Local and Non-local Regularization Techniques in Emission (PET/SPECT) Tomographic Image Reconstruction Methods.

Authors:  Munir Ahmad; Tasawar Shahzad; Khalid Masood; Khalid Rashid; Muhammad Tanveer; Rabail Iqbal; Nasir Hussain; Abubakar Shahid
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Direct reconstruction of parametric images for brain PET with event-by-event motion correction: evaluation in two tracers across count levels.

Authors:  Mary Germino; Jean-Dominque Gallezot; Jianhua Yan; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Anatomy-guided brain PET imaging incorporating a joint prior model.

Authors:  Lijun Lu; Jianhua Ma; Qianjin Feng; Wufan Chen; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  [Kinetic cluster and α-divergence-based dynamic myocardial factorial analysis of positron-emission computed tomography images].

Authors:  Pei-Pei Wang; Li-Jun Lu; Shuang-Liang Cao; Hua-Yong Li; Wu-Fan Chen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

5.  Robust dynamic myocardial perfusion CT deconvolution for accurate residue function estimation via adaptive-weighted tensor total variation regularization: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Dong Zeng; Changfei Gong; Zhaoying Bian; Jing Huang; Xinyu Zhang; Hua Zhang; Lijun Lu; Shanzhou Niu; Zhang Zhang; Zhengrong Liang; Qianjin Feng; Wufan Chen; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Simultaneous Denoising of Dynamic PET Images Based on Deep Image Prior.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsun Yang; Hsuan-Ming Huang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.903

7.  Dynamic FDG-PET Imaging to Differentiate Malignancies from Inflammation in Subcutaneous and In Situ Mouse Model for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC).

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Yunlong Zan; Xiujuan Zheng; Wangxi Hai; Kewei Chen; Qiu Huang; Yuhong Xu; Jinliang Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer.

Authors:  K Vanhove; P Giesen; O E Owokotomo; L Mesotten; E Louis; Z Shkedy; M Thomeer; P Adriaensens
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Gaussian Mixture Models and Model Selection for [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Classification in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Rui Li; Robert Perneczky; Igor Yakushev; Stefan Förster; Alexander Kurz; Alexander Drzezga; Stefan Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic positron emission tomography image restoration via a kinetics-induced bilateral filter.

Authors:  Zhaoying Bian; Jing Huang; Jianhua Ma; Lijun Lu; Shanzhou Niu; Dong Zeng; Qianjin Feng; Wufan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.