Literature DB >> 22800617

Compensation to positive as well as negative lenses can occur in chicks reared in bright UV lighting.

David S Hammond1, Christine F Wildsoet.   

Abstract

An earlier report describing a lack of compensation to imposed myopic and hyperopic defocus in chicks reared in UV lighting has led to the belief that the spatial resolving power of the UV cone photoreceptor network in chicks is not capable of decoding optical defocus. However this study used dim light rearing conditions, of less than 10 lx. The purpose of the current study was to determine if emmetropization is possible in young chicks reared under higher luminance, UV lighting conditions. Young, 4 day-old chicks were reared under diurnal near UV (390 nm) illumination set to either 20 or 200 lx while wearing a monocular defocusing lens (+20, +10, -10 or -20 D), for 7 days. Similarly treated control groups were reared under diurnal white lighting (WL) of matching illuminance. The WL and UV LED sources were set to equivalent illuminances, measured in "chick lux", calculated from radiometer readings taken through appropriate narrow band interference filters, and a mathematical model of the spectral sensitivity of the chick visual system. High resolution A-scan ultrasonography was undertaken on days 0 (before lenses were fitted), 2, 4, and 7 to track ocular dimensions and refractive errors were measured by retinoscopy on days 0 and 7. Compensation to negative lenses was unaffected by UV illuminance levels, with near full compensation being achieved under both conditions, as well as under both WL conditions. In contrast, compensation to the positive lenses was markedly impaired in 20 lx UV lighting, with increased instead of decreased axial elongation along with a myopic refractive shift being recorded with the +10D lens. Compensation under both WL conditions was again near normal for the +10D lens. However, with the +20 D lens, myopic shifts in refractive error were observed under both dim UV and WL conditions. The spatial resolving power of the UV cone photoreceptor network in the chick is sufficient to detect optical defocus and guide the emmetropization response, provided illumination is sufficiently high. However, compensation to imposed myopic defocus may be compromised, when either the amount of defocus is very high or illumination low, especially when the wavelength is restricted to the UV range.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22800617      PMCID: PMC4008941          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  26 in total

1.  Diurnal control of rod function in the chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; B Rohrer; T Lemmer; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Different visual deprivations produce different ametropias and different eye shapes.

Authors:  M D Gottlieb; L A Fugate-Wentzek; J Wallman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The topographical distribution of rods and cones in the adult chicken retina.

Authors:  D B Meyer; H C May
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1973-11-25       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Symmetry in a receptor mosaic demonstrated in the chick from the frequencies, spacing and arrangement of the types of retinal receptor.

Authors:  V B Morris
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; A Glasser; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Appearance of a Purkinje shift in the developing retina of the chick.

Authors:  D M Chen; T H Goldsmith
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1984-02

Review 7.  Retinal neuromodulation: the role of dopamine.

Authors:  J E Dowling
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Dopaminergic agonists that result in ocular growth inhibition also elicit transient increases in choroidal thickness in chicks.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Kristen Totonelly; Balprit Dhillon
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Longitudinal chromatic aberration and emmetropization: results from the chicken eye.

Authors:  B Rohrer; F Schaeffel; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Inhibitory effects of apomorphine and atropine and their combination on myopia in chicks.

Authors:  Katrina L Schmid; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Monochromatic and white light and the regulation of eye growth.

Authors:  Frances Rucker
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Intermittent episodes of bright light suppress myopia in the chicken more than continuous bright light.

Authors:  Weizhong Lan; Marita Feldkaemper; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.