Literature DB >> 1522513

Longitudinal chromatic aberration and emmetropization: results from the chicken eye.

B Rohrer1, F Schaeffel, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

1. Due to the chromatic dispersion of the ocular media, the focal length of the optics of the eye is about 3 diopters longer for red light than for blue light. Because emmetropization in the chicken (Gallus domesticus) does not require colour cues and operates properly in monochromatic light, one can, therefore, expect that chickens raised in red light become more myopic (with longer eyes) than chicks raised in short wavelength light. Prior to conducting this experiment, we matched the brightness of both light conditions by means of flicker electroretinograms such that equiluminance was obtained for the chickens. 2. Unexpectedly, refractive development was not different from controls in white light for either red or near-ultraviolet light. 3. We tested whether the visual mechanisms guiding refractive development were still sensitive to defocus under both illuminations by treating the chicks with spectacle lenses. 4. Similar to a previous experiment in white light, the growth of the eye in red light also changed such that it compensated for the imposed defocus. It failed to do so, however, in near-ultraviolet light. 5. A histological analysis of the sampling intervals for the ultraviolet receptor system revealed that its spatial resolving power was too low to detect the defocus imposed by the lenses, whereas the long wavelength receptors provided sufficiently good visual acuity. 6. The results show that, during emmetropization, the chicken eye elegantly bypasses the problem of multiple chromatic focal planes by having a low sensitivity to defocus in the blue end of the spectrum. Because the chromatic dispersion function is steep in the blue range but flat at the red end of the spectrum, the remaining chromatic defocus in the spectral range of high visual acuity is low and may match the depth of field of the eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1522513      PMCID: PMC1176083          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  28 in total

1.  The accommodation reflex and its stimulus.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1951-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The visual pigments and oil droplets of the chicken retina.

Authors:  J K Bowmaker; A Knowles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization.

Authors:  J Wallman; J I Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Different visual deprivations produce different ametropias and different eye shapes.

Authors:  M D Gottlieb; L A Fugate-Wentzek; J Wallman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Retinoscopy and eye size.

Authors:  M Glickstein; M Millodot
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Longitudinal chromatic aberration of the vertebrate eye.

Authors:  T Mandelman; J G Sivak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  An animal model of myopia.

Authors:  E Raviola; T N Wiesel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intracellular recordings from single rods and cones in the mudpuppy retina.

Authors:  G L Fain; J E Dowling
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The eyes of young chickens grow toward emmetropia.

Authors:  J Wallman; J I Adams; J N Trachtman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  24 in total

1.  Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Stephanie Britton; Molly Spatcher; Stephan Hanowsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia.

Authors:  Marsha L Kisilak; Melanie C W Campbell; Jennifer J Hunter; Elizabeth L Irving; Lan Huang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The hyperopic effect of narrow-band long-wavelength light in tree shrews increases non-linearly with duration.

Authors:  Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton; Carrie E Huisingh; Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Cone signals for spectacle-lens compensation: differential responses to short and long wavelengths.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Narrow-band, long-wavelength lighting promotes hyperopia and retards vision-induced myopia in infant rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Zhihui She; Lisa Ostrin; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Compensation to positive as well as negative lenses can occur in chicks reared in bright UV lighting.

Authors:  David S Hammond; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; John T Siegwart; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.