Literature DB >> 22800286

A status-enhancement account of overconfidence.

Cameron Anderson1, Sebastien Brion, Don A Moore, Jessica A Kennedy.   

Abstract

In explaining the prevalence of the overconfident belief that one is better than others, prior work has focused on the motive to maintain high self-esteem, abetted by biases in attention, memory, and cognition. An additional possibility is that overconfidence enhances the person's social status. We tested this status-enhancing account of overconfidence in 6 studies. Studies 1-3 found that overconfidence leads to higher social status in both short- and longer-term groups, using naturalistic and experimental designs. Study 4 applied a Brunswikian lens analysis (Brunswik, 1956) and found that overconfidence leads to a behavioral signature that makes the individual appear competent to others. Studies 5 and 6 measured and experimentally manipulated the desire for status and found that the status motive promotes overconfidence. Together, these studies suggest that people might so often believe they are better than others because it helps them achieve higher social status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22800286     DOI: 10.1037/a0029395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  24 in total

1.  Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lyons; Jacob M Montgomery; Andrew M Guess; Brendan Nyhan; Jason Reifler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Childhood growth in math and reading differentially predicts adolescent non-ability-based confidence: An examination in the SECCYD.

Authors:  Randi L Vogt; Joey T Cheng; Daniel A Briley
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2020-10-04

3.  On Bullsh*t and Medical Education.

Authors:  Julie Rice
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-10

4.  Decisional autonomy undermines advisees' judgments of experts in medicine and in life.

Authors:  Samantha Kassirer; Emma E Levine; Celia Gaertig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Strategic disinformation outperforms honesty in competition for social influence.

Authors:  Ralf H J M Kurvers; Uri Hertz; Jurgis Karpus; Marta P Balode; Bertrand Jayles; Ken Binmore; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  Gender Differences in Performance Predictions: Evidence from the Cognitive Reflection Test.

Authors:  Patrick Ring; Levent Neyse; Tamas David-Barett; Ulrich Schmidt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Path Models of Vocal Emotion Communication.

Authors:  Tanja Bänziger; Georg Hosoya; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  This examined life: the upside of self-knowledge for interpersonal relationships.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Tenney; Simine Vazire; Matthias R Mehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bluffing promotes overconfidence on social networks.

Authors:  Kun Li; Rui Cong; Te Wu; Long Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Self-deceived individuals are better at deceiving others.

Authors:  Shakti Lamba; Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.