| Literature DB >> 22799487 |
Giovana Tardin Torrezan1, Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva, Ana Cristina Victorino Krepischi, Erika Maria Monteiro dos Santos, Benedito Mauro Rossi, Dirce Maria Carraro.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome caused by a loss of function of the APC gene. Large deletions in APC are a common cause of FAP; despite the existence of a variety of gene dosage detection methodologies, most are labor intensive and time and resource consuming.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22799487 PMCID: PMC3458979 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-55
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Figure 1Missense mutation and deletion of the gene in one FAP patient. A: Chromatogram of the novel missense variant c.6965A > G p.Gln2322Arg in APC exon 15 apparently in homozygosis. B: Melt curve of duplex qPCR of APC exon 15 and GAPDH intron 7 (reference gene) – PMc ratio of APC/GAPDH in the control sample was 1.4 and in the FAP patient it was 0.86, leading to a normalized PMc ratio of 0.61 for the FAP patient, indicating the presence of deletion. C: aCGH chromosome 5 profile of the FAP patient showing a 5.2 Mb deletion at 5q21.3-q22.3 that encompasses the entire APC sequence (red circle) and 19 additional genes.
Figure 2X chromosome dosage assay for validation of the SYBR green duplex qPCR. A: Distribution of the normalized HPRT1 / GAPDH ratio in 24 control samples (12 females and 12 males); the normalized ratio of the 12 female samples ranged from 0.90 to 1.09, while in the 12 male samples the range was from 0.63 to 0.70, when using a female sample as the control. B: Visual comparison of the melt curve revealing a reduction of the HPRT1 peak when comparing a male to a female sample.
Figure 3Sensitivity of the duplex qPCR. The sensitivity of this methodology was investigated by mixing different DNA proportions of the deleted patient and a healthy control. A: First panel presents the melting curve of the five different DNA proportions used (described in the first line of the table); second and third line show the gene dosage ratio between APC and GAPDH present in each mixed DNA solution and the respective expected normalized PMc ratio; last line presents mean and standard deviation (SD) of the observed normalized PMc ratio duplicates. The results demonstrated that this approach could detect gene dosage alterations even when only 25% of the DNA carried the heterozygous gene deletion (proportion 4 = 1 P : 3 C). B: Linear regression of the observed normalized PMc ratio in relation to the expected PMc ratio, demonstrating an r² of 0.957.