Literature DB >> 22798704

Does insect netting affect the containment of airborne pollen from (GM-) plants in greenhouses?

Thomas van Hengstum, Danny A P Hooftman, Hans C M den Nijs, Peter H van Tienderen.   

Abstract

Greenhouses are a well-accepted containment strategy to grow and study genetically modified plants (GM) before release into the environment. Various containment levels are requested by national regulations to minimize GM pollen escape. We tested the amount of pollen escaping from a standard greenhouse, which can be used for EU containment classes 1 and 2. More specifically, we investigated the hypothesis whether pollen escape could be minimized by insect-proof netting in front of the roof windows, since the turbulent airflow around the mesh wiring could avoid pollen from escaping. We studied the pollen flow out of greenhouses with and without insect netting of two non-transgenic crops, Ryegrass (Loliummultiflorum) and Corn (Zea Mays). Pollen flow was assessed with Rotorod(®) pollen samplers positioned inside and outside the greenhouse' roof windows. A significant proportion of airborne pollen inside the greenhouse leaves through roof windows. Moreover, the lighter pollen of Lolium escaped more readily than the heavier pollen of Maize. In contrast to our expectations, we did not identify any reduction in pollen flow with insect netting in front of open windows, even under induced airflow conditions. We conclude that insect netting, often present by default in greenhouses, is not effective in preventing pollen escape from greenhouses of wind-pollinated plants for containment classes 1 or 2. Further research would be needed to investigate whether other alternative strategies, including biotic ones, are more effective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10453-011-9237-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22798704      PMCID: PMC3389241          DOI: 10.1007/s10453-011-9237-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)        ISSN: 0393-5965            Impact factor:   2.410


  7 in total

1.  The effect of windspeed on pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trap.

Authors:  D A Frenz
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 2.  Letting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Mark A Chapman; John M Burke
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Dirk Reheul; Adinda De Schrijver
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun

4.  Air-mediated pollen flow from genetically modified to conventional crops.

Authors:  Anna Kuparinen; Frank Schurr; Oliver Tackenberg; Robert B O'Hara
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 5.  Transgene introgression in crop relatives: molecular evidence and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Charles Kwit; Hong S Moon; Suzanne I Warwick; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 6.  GM risk assessment.

Authors:  P A C Sparrow
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Locus-dependent selection in crop-wild hybrids of lettuce under field conditions and its implication for GM crop development.

Authors:  Danny A P Hooftman; Andrew J Flavell; Hans Jansen; Hans C M den Nijs; Naeem H Syed; Anker P Sørensen; Pablo Orozco-Ter Wengel; Clemens C M van de Wiel
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.