Literature DB >> 17489250

Air-mediated pollen flow from genetically modified to conventional crops.

Anna Kuparinen1, Frank Schurr, Oliver Tackenberg, Robert B O'Hara.   

Abstract

Tools for estimating pollen dispersal and the resulting gene flow are necessary to assess the risk of gene flow from genetically modified (GM) to conventional fields, and to quantify the effectiveness of measures that may prevent such gene flow. A mechanistic simulation model is presented and used to simulate pollen dispersal by wind in different agricultural scenarios over realistic pollination periods. The relative importance of landscape-related variables such as isolation distance, topography, spatial configuration of the fields, GM field size and barrier, and environmental variation are examined in order to find ways to minimize gene flow and to detect possible risk factors. The simulations demonstrated a large variation in pollen dispersal and in the predicted amount of contamination between different pollination periods. This was largely due to variation in vertical wind. As this variation in wind conditions is difficult to control through management measures, it should be carefully considered when estimating the risk of gene flow from GM crops. On average, the predicted level of gene flow decreased with increasing isolation distance and with increasing depth of the conventional field, and increased with increasing GM field size. Therefore, at a national scale and over the long term these landscape properties should be accounted for when setting regulations for controlling gene flow. However, at the level of an individual field the level of gene flow may be dominated by uncontrollable variation. Due to the sensitivity of pollen dispersal to the wind, we conclude that gene flow cannot be summarized only by the mean contamination; information about the frequency of extreme events should also be considered. The modeling approach described in this paper offers a way to predict and compare pollen dispersal and gene flow in varying environmental conditions, and to assess the effectiveness of different management measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489250     DOI: 10.1890/05-1599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  2 in total

1.  Does insect netting affect the containment of airborne pollen from (GM-) plants in greenhouses?

Authors:  Thomas van Hengstum; Danny A P Hooftman; Hans C M den Nijs; Peter H van Tienderen
Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 2.  Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Feed: Is There Any Difference From Food?

Authors:  Paula A Giraldo; Hiroshi Shinozuka; German C Spangenberg; Noel O I Cogan; Kevin F Smith
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.