RATIONALE: Mycobacterium tuberculosis is transmitted by infectious aerosols, but assessing infectiousness currently relies on sputum microscopy that does not accurately predict the variability in transmission. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of collecting cough aerosols and the risk factors for infectious aerosol production from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: We enrolled subjects with suspected TB in Kampala, Uganda and collected clinical, radiographic, and microbiological data in addition to cough aerosol cultures. A subset of 38 subjects was studied on 2 or 3 consecutive days to assess reproducibility. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: M. tuberculosis was cultured from cough aerosols of 28 of 101 (27.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9-37.1%) subjects with culture-confirmed TB, with a median 16 aerosol cfu (range, 1-701) in 10 minutes of coughing. Nearly all (96.4%) cultivable particles were 0.65 to 4.7 μm in size. Positive aerosol cultures were associated with higher Karnofsky performance scores (P = 0.016), higher sputum acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy grades (P = 0.007), lower days to positive in liquid culture (P = 0.004), stronger cough (P = 0.016), and fewer days on TB treatment (P = 0.047). In multivariable analyses, cough aerosol cultures were associated with a salivary/mucosalivary (compared with purulent/mucopurulent) appearance of sputum (odds ratio, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.23-21.43) and low days to positive (per 1-d decrease; odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33). The within-test (kappa, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94) and interday test (kappa, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.82) reproducibility were high. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients with TB (28%) produced culturable cough aerosols. Collection of cough aerosol cultures is feasible and reproducible in a resource-limited setting.
RATIONALE: Mycobacterium tuberculosis is transmitted by infectious aerosols, but assessing infectiousness currently relies on sputum microscopy that does not accurately predict the variability in transmission. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of collecting cough aerosols and the risk factors for infectious aerosol production from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: We enrolled subjects with suspected TB in Kampala, Uganda and collected clinical, radiographic, and microbiological data in addition to cough aerosol cultures. A subset of 38 subjects was studied on 2 or 3 consecutive days to assess reproducibility. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: M. tuberculosis was cultured from cough aerosols of 28 of 101 (27.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9-37.1%) subjects with culture-confirmed TB, with a median 16 aerosol cfu (range, 1-701) in 10 minutes of coughing. Nearly all (96.4%) cultivable particles were 0.65 to 4.7 μm in size. Positive aerosol cultures were associated with higher Karnofsky performance scores (P = 0.016), higher sputum acid-fast bacilli smear microscopy grades (P = 0.007), lower days to positive in liquid culture (P = 0.004), stronger cough (P = 0.016), and fewer days on TB treatment (P = 0.047). In multivariable analyses, cough aerosol cultures were associated with a salivary/mucosalivary (compared with purulent/mucopurulent) appearance of sputum (odds ratio, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.23-21.43) and low days to positive (per 1-d decrease; odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33). The within-test (kappa, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.94) and interday test (kappa, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.82) reproducibility were high. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients with TB (28%) produced culturable cough aerosols. Collection of cough aerosol cultures is feasible and reproducible in a resource-limited setting.
Authors: Neel R Gandhi; Anthony Moll; A Willem Sturm; Robert Pawinski; Thiloshini Govender; Umesh Lalloo; Kimberly Zeller; Jason Andrews; Gerald Friedland Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-11-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elizabeth L Corbett; Catherine J Watt; Neff Walker; Dermot Maher; Brian G Williams; Mario C Raviglione; Christopher Dye Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-05-12
Authors: Grant Theron; Jason Limberis; Rouxjeane Venter; Liezel Smith; Elize Pietersen; Aliasgar Esmail; Greg Calligaro; Julian Te Riele; Marianna de Kock; Paul van Helden; Tawanda Gumbo; Taane G Clark; Kevin Fennelly; Robin Warren; Keertan Dheda Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: J Cavanaugh; K Viney; T Kienene; D Harley; P M Kelly; A Sleigh; J O'Connor; S Mase Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Julian S Peters; Jason R Andrews; Mark Hatherill; Sabine Hermans; Leonardo Martinez; Erwin Schurr; Yuri van der Heijden; Robin Wood; Roxana Rustomjee; Bavesh D Kana Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: A S Dharmadhikari; M Mphahlele; K Venter; A Stoltz; R Mathebula; T Masotla; M van der Walt; M Pagano; P Jensen; E Nardell Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.373