Literature DB >> 22798224

Renal measurements on CT angiograms: correlation with graft function at living donor renal transplantation.

Motoyo Yano1, Michael F Lin, Kelsey A Hoffman, Anitha Vijayan, Thomas K Pilgram, Vamsi R Narra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine which measurement of donor renal size on computed tomographic (CT) angiograms has the greatest correlation with renal function preoperatively in the donor and postoperatively in the transplant recipient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was waived for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study approved by the institutional review board. Renal length, total volume, and cortical volume were measured on renal donor CT angiograms in 111 patients. Preoperative serum creatinine values for donors and postoperative creatinine values for recipients at hospital discharge and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after transplant were collected, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated. Correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for renal measures and donor eGFR and for renal measures adjusted to recipient body habitus and posttransplant creatinine level in the recipient. Thresholds were set for adjusted length and volumes, and the odds ratio (OR) for creatinine level less than 1.5 mg/dL at 36 months was calculated.
RESULTS: Renal volumes and length were correlated with donor eGFR (r=0.58 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.69] for cortical volume, 0.56 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.68] for total volume, and 0.43 [95% CI: 0.27, 0.57] for renal length). All three measures, adjusted to recipient body habitus, were correlated with recipient renal function from discharge (r=-0.41 to -0.43) up to 36 months after transplantation (r=-0.33 to -0.41). By using a threshold of 1.5 for cortical volume to recipient weight, 2.25 for total volume to recipient weight, and 0.175 for renal length to recipient weight, the odds of creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dL were four times as great for smaller kidney-to-recipient weight ratios, a statistically significant pattern for cortical volume (OR, 4.07; 95% CI: 1.10, 15.09) but not total volume (OR, 4.24; 95% CI: 0.90, 20.01) or renal length (OR, 4.08; 95% CI: 0.48-34.29).
CONCLUSION: Renal length and volumes correlated with recipient renal function up to 36 months after transplant. A low ratio of cortical volume to recipient weight was associated with diminished renal function at 36 months after transplant. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22798224     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  A simple method to estimate renal volume from computed tomography.

Authors:  Rodney H Breau; Edward Clark; Bryan Bruner; Patrick Cervini; Thomas Atwell; Greg Knoll; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Renal relevant radiology: imaging in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Asif Sharfuddin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Effect of various environments and computed tomography scanning parameters on renal volume measurements in vitro: A phantom study.

Authors:  Wangyan Liu; Yinsu Zhu; Lijun Tang; Xiaomei Zhu; Yi Xu; Guanyu Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Copeptin is associated with kidney length, renal function, and prevalence of simple cysts in a population-based study.

Authors:  Belen Ponte; Menno Pruijm; Daniel Ackermann; Philippe Vuistiner; Idris Guessous; Georg Ehret; Heba Alwan; Sonia Youhanna; Fred Paccaud; Markus Mohaupt; Antoinette Péchère-Bertschi; Bruno Vogt; Michel Burnier; Pierre-Yves Martin; Olivier Devuyst; Murielle Bochud
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Novel prediction model of renal function after nephrectomy from automated renal volumetry with preoperative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Authors:  Shuji Isotani; Hirofumi Shimoyama; Isao Yokota; Yasuhiro Noma; Kousuke Kitamura; Toshiyuki China; Keisuke Saito; Shin-ichi Hisasue; Hisamitsu Ide; Satoru Muto; Raizo Yamaguchi; Osamu Ukimura; Inderbir S Gill; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 2.801

6.  Automated renal cortical volume measurement for assessment of renal function in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hirofumi Shimoyama; Shuji Isotani; Toshiyuki China; Masayoshi Nagata; Isao Yokota; Kosuke Kitamura; Yoshiaki Wakumoto; Hisamitsu Ide; Satoru Muto; Akira Tujimura; Raizo Yamaguchi; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  The Outcomes of Living Kidney Donation from Medically Complex Donors: Implications for the Donor and the Recipient.

Authors:  Matthew Niemi; Didier A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2014-03-01

8.  Does size matter? Kidney transplant donor size determines kidney function among living donors.

Authors:  Meenakshi Narasimhamurthy; Lachlan M Smith; Jason T Machan; Steven E Reinert; Reginald Y Gohh; Lance D Dworkin; Basma Merhi; Nikunjkumar Patel; Michael D Beland; Susie L Hu
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2016-10-04

9.  Estimation of nephron number in living humans by combining unenhanced computed tomography with biopsy-based stereology.

Authors:  Takaya Sasaki; Nobuo Tsuboi; Yusuke Okabayashi; Kotaro Haruhara; Go Kanzaki; Kentaro Koike; Akimitsu Kobayashi; Izumi Yamamoto; Sho Takahashi; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Akira Shimizu; Andrew D Rule; John F Bertram; Takashi Yokoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Impact of adjusted kidney volume measured in the bench surgery on one-year renal function in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Flávio Vasconcelos Ordones; Pedro Ivo Rocchetti Pajolli; Rodrigo Guerra da Silva; Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto; Fernando Fereira Gomes Filho; Paulo Roberto Kawano; João Luiz Amaro; Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.