Literature DB >> 22795474

Effect of a vocal choice reaction time task on the kinematics of the first recovery step after a sudden underfoot perturbation during gait.

Joseph O Nnodim1, Hogene Kim, James A Ashton-Miller.   

Abstract

Thirty-two healthy young adults (15 women) were tested for their ability to maintain their comfortable step pattern following an unpredictable underfoot perturbation in the presence and absence of a concurrent vocal choice reaction time task. Custom instrumented shoes were used to randomly deliver an unexpected medial or lateral forefoot perturbation that inverted the mid-foot an average of 10° or everted the midfoot an average of 9° during one stance phase of a gait trial. Medial and lateral perturbations were randomized between left and right feet in 12 of 30 gait trials. The results of the repeated measures analyses of variance show that, compared to the step parameters of unperturbed gait, the administration of the unexpected underfoot perturbation did not significantly lead to alterations in the step length or width of the first recovery step. In addition, the simultaneous administration of a vocal choice reaction time task with the underfoot perturbation did not significantly affect the kinematics of the first recovery step. We conclude that in young healthy adults an unexpected 9-10° underfoot perturbation, with or without a vocal reaction time task, will not affect their recovery step kinematics when walking at a comfortable gait speed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795474      PMCID: PMC4050174          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  28 in total

Review 1.  Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Brian Levine
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Age differences in timed accurate stepping with increasing cognitive and visual demand: a walking trail making test.

Authors:  Neil B Alexander; James A Ashton-Miller; Bruno Giordani; Ken Guire; Albert B Schultz
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  What causes a crossover step when walking on uneven ground? A study in healthy young women.

Authors:  Sibylle B Thies; James A Ashton-Miller; James K Richardson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  "Stops walking when talking" as a predictor of falls in elderly people.

Authors:  L Lundin-Olsson; L Nyberg; Y Gustafson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effects of surface irregularity and lighting on step variability during gait: a study in healthy young and older women.

Authors:  Sibylle B Thies; James K Richardson; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety.

Authors:  William H Gage; Ryan J Sleik; Melody A Polych; Nicole C McKenzie; Lesley A Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Does inability to allocate attention contribute to balance constraints during gait in older adults?

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Li-Shan Chou; Ulrich Mayr; Paul van Donkelaar; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults.

Authors:  Olivier Beauchet; Véronique Dubost; François R Herrmann; Reto W Kressig
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Human treadmill walking needs attention.

Authors:  Jean Philippe Regnaux; Johanna Roberston; Djamel Ben Smail; Olivier Daniel; Bernard Bussel
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dual-task performance in older adults during discrete gait perturbation.

Authors:  Joseph O Nnodim; Hogene Kim; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of age on the ability to recover from a single unexpected underfoot perturbation during gait: kinematic responses.

Authors:  Hogene Kim; Joseph O Nnodim; James K Richardson; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Anticipatory and reactive responses to underfoot perturbations during gait in healthy adults and individuals with a recent mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nicholas Kreter; Claire L Rogers; Peter C Fino
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of Temporal-Spatial, Kinematic, and Dynamic Stability Measures during Perturbed Gait.

Authors:  Christopher A Rábago; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Balance recovery stepping responses during walking were not affected by a concurrent cognitive task among older adults.

Authors:  Inbal Paran; Hadas Nachmani; Moti Salti; Ilan Shelef; Itshak Melzer
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.921

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.