Literature DB >> 28041990

Estimating systemic exposure to levonorgestrel from an oral contraceptive.

Cale N Basaraba1, Carolyn L Westhoff2, Malcolm C Pike3, Renu Nandakumar4, Serge Cremers5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for measuring oral contraceptive (OC) pharmacokinetics is the 24-h steady-state area under the curve (AUC). We conducted this study to assess whether limited sampling at steady state or measurements following use of one or two OCs could provide an adequate proxy in epidemiological studies for the progestin 24-h steady-state AUC of a particular OC. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a 13-sample, 24-h pharmacokinetic study on both day 1 and day 21 of the first cycle of a monophasic OC containing 30-mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150-mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) in 17 normal-weight healthy White women and a single-dose 9-sample study of the same OC after a 1-month washout. We compared the 13-sample steady-state results with several steady-state and single-dose results calculated using parsimonious sampling schemes.
RESULTS: The 13-sample steady-state 24-h LNG AUC was highly correlated with the steady-state 24-h trough value [r=0.95; 95% confidence interval (0.85, 0.98)] and with the steady-state 6-, 8-, 12- and 16-h values (0.92≤r≤0.95). The trough values after one or two doses were moderately correlated with the steady-state 24-h AUC value [r=0.70; 95% CI (0.27, 0.90) and 0.77; 95% CI (0.40, 0.92), respectively].
CONCLUSIONS: Single time-point concentrations at steady state and after administration of one or two OCs gave highly to moderately correlated estimates of steady-state LNG AUC. Using such measures could facilitate prospective pharmaco-epidemiologic studies of the OC and its side effects. IMPLICATIONS: A single time-point LNG concentration at steady state is an excellent proxy for complete and resource-intensive steady-state AUC measurement. The trough level after two single doses is a fair proxy for steady-state AUC. These results provide practical tools to facilitate large studies to investigate the relationship between systemic LNG exposure and side effects in a real-life setting.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethinyl estradiol; Levonorgestrel; Oral contraceptives; Pharmacokinetics; Single dose; Steady state

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041990      PMCID: PMC5376510          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  21 in total

Review 1.  Molecular basis of ethnic differences in drug disposition and response.

Authors:  H G Xie; R B Kim; A J Wood; C M Stein
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  Pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive in obese and normal-weight women.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Anupama H Torgal; Elizabeth R Mayeda; Malcolm C Pike; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Oral contraceptives and individual variability of circulating levels of ethinyl estradiol and progestins.

Authors:  Joseph W Goldzieher; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Progestins for contraception: modern delivery systems and novel formulations.

Authors:  Pamela A Royer; Kirtly P Jones
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Single-point prediction methods: a critical review.

Authors:  J R Koup
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1982-11

6.  AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Eduard M Scholten; Serge C L M Cremers; Rik C Schoemaker; Ajda T Rowshani; Erik J van Kan; Jan den Hartigh; Leendert C Paul; Johan W de Fijter
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Estimating systemic exposure to ethinyl estradiol from an oral contraceptive.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Malcolm C Pike; Rosalind Tang; Marianne N DiNapoli; Monica Sull; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Marcos de Bastos; Bernardine H Stegeman; Frits R Rosendaal; Astrid Van Hylckama Vlieg; Frans M Helmerhorst; Theo Stijnen; Olaf M Dekkers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-03

9.  Binding of levonorgestrel, norethisterone and desogestrel to human sex hormone binding globulin and influence on free testosterone levels.

Authors:  B Nilsson; B von Schoultz
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Free estradiol and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: comparison of measured and calculated values.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  7 in total

1.  Hormonal contraception and breast cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  The progesterone-receptor modulator, ulipristal acetate, drastically lowers breast cell proliferation.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Hua Guo; Zhong Wang; Hanina Hibshoosh; Margaret Polaneczky; Malcolm C Pike; Richard Ha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.624

3.  Altered pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptives in obesity - multistudy assessment.

Authors:  Dandan Luo; Carolyn L Westhoff; Alison B Edelman; Melissa Natavio; Frank Z Stanczyk; William J Jusko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Hormonal contraception and breast cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn L Westhoff; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and serum concentrations of progestins used in contraception.

Authors:  Alexis J Bick; Renate Louw-du Toit; Salndave B Skosana; Donita Africander; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 13.400

6.  Pharmacokinetics of Oral Levonorgestrel in Women After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery and in BMI-Matched Controls.

Authors:  Charlotte Ginstman; Helena Kopp Kallner; Johanna Fagerberg-Silwer; Björn Carlsson; Andreas Ärlemalm; Ylva Böttiger; Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Atogepant Has No Clinically Relevant Effects on the Pharmacokinetics of an Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Female Participants.

Authors:  Wendy Ankrom; Jialin Xu; Marie-Helene Vallee; Marissa F Dockendorf; Danielle Armas; Ramesh Boinpally; K Chris Min
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.126

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.