Literature DB >> 22794925

Comparative proteomic study between tuberous roots of light orange- and purple-fleshed sweetpotato cultivars.

Jeung Joo Lee1, Kee Woong Park2, Youn-Sig Kwak1, Jae Young Ahn1, Young Hak Jung3, Byung-Hyun Lee3, Jae Cheol Jeong4, Haeng-Soon Lee4, Sang-Soo Kwak5.   

Abstract

This study compares the differences in proteomes expressed in tuberous roots of a light orange-fleshed sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. cultivar Yulmi) and a purple-fleshed sweetpotato cultivar (Shinjami). More than 370 protein spots were reproducibly detected by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, in which 35 spots were up-regulated (Yulmi vs. Shinjami) or uniquely expressed (only Yulmi or Shinjami) in either of the two cultivars. Of these 35 protein spots, 23 were expressed in Yulmi and 12 were expressed in Shinjami. These protein spots were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Fifteen proteins in Yulmi and eight proteins in Shinjami were identified from the up-regulated (Yulmi vs. Shinjami) or uniquely expressed (only Yulmi or Shinjami) proteins, respectively. In Yulmi, α-amylase and isomerase precursor-like protein were uniquely expressed or up-regulated and activities of α-amylase, monodehydroascorbate reductase, and dehydroascorbate reductase were higher than in Shinjami. In Shinjami, peroxidase precursor and aldo-keto reductase were uniquely expressed or up-regulated and peroxidase and aldo-keto reductase activities were higher than in Yulmi. PSG-RGH7 uniquely expressed only in Shinjami and the cultivar was evaluated more resistant than Yulmi against the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Kofold and White, 1919) Chitwood 1949 on the basis of shoot and root growth. Egg mass formation was 14.9-fold less in Shinjami than in Yulmi. These results provide important clues that can provide a foundation for sweetpotato proteomics and lead to the characterization of the physiological function of differentially expressed proteins.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22794925     DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Sci        ISSN: 0168-9452            Impact factor:   4.729


  6 in total

1.  Conserved changes in the dynamics of metabolic processes during fruit development and ripening across species.

Authors:  Sebastian Klie; Sonia Osorio; Takayuki Tohge; María F Drincovich; Aaron Fait; James J Giovannoni; Alisdair R Fernie; Zoran Nikoloski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Transcriptome analysis of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita)-resistant and susceptible sweetpotato cultivars.

Authors:  Il Hwan Lee; Donghwan Shim; Jea Cheol Jeong; Yeon Woo Sung; Ki Jung Nam; Jung-Wook Yang; Joon Ha; Jeung Joo Lee; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 3.  Metabolic engineering of carotenoids in transgenic sweetpotato.

Authors:  Le Kang; Sung-Chul Park; Chang Yoon Ji; Ho Soo Kim; Haeng-Soon Lee; Sang-Soo Kwak
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Identification of potassium phosphite responsive miRNAs and their targets in potato.

Authors:  María Florencia Rey-Burusco; Gustavo Raúl Daleo; Mariana Laura Feldman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative proteomic analysis of the sweetpotato provides insights into response mechanisms to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. batatas.

Authors:  ShiQiang Lin; ZhiJian Yang; BiFang Huang; ChuYun Bi; XiaoFang Huang; GuoTai Chen; Nuerla Nijiati; XuanYang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Proteomic and metabolic profile analysis of low-temperature storage responses in Ipomoea batata Lam. tuberous roots.

Authors:  Peng Cui; Yongxin Li; Chenke Cui; Yanrong Huo; Guoquan Lu; Huqing Yang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.215

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.