| Literature DB >> 22794196 |
Stuart Macgregor1, Georgia Chenevix-Trench1, Yi Lu1, Xiaoqing Chen1, Jonathan Beesley1, Sharon E Johnatty1, Anna deFazio2,3, Sandrina Lambrechts4, Diether Lambrechts5,6, Evelyn Despierre4, Ignace Vergotes4, Jenny Chang-Claude7, Rebecca Hein7, Stefan Nickels7, Shan Wang-Gohrke8, Thilo Dörk9, Matthias Dürst10, Natalia Antonenkova11, Natalia Bogdanova11,12, Marc T Goodman13, Galina Lurie13, Lynne R Wilkens13, Michael E Carney14, Ralf Butzow15, Heli Nevanlinna15, Tuomas Heikkinen15, Arto Leminen15, Lambertus A Kiemeney16,17,18, Leon F A G Massuger19, Anne M van Altena19, Katja K Aben17,18, Susanne Krüger Kjaer20, Estrid Høgdall20, Allan Jensen21, Angela Brooks-Wilson22,23, Nhu Le24, Linda Cook25, Madalene Earp23, Linda Kelemen26, Douglas Easton27, Paul Pharoah27, Honglin Song27, Jonathan Tyrer27, Susan Ramus28, Usha Menon29, Alexandra Gentry-Maharaj29, Simon A Gayther28, Elisa V Bandera30,31, Sara H Olson31, Irene Orlow31, Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez30.
Abstract
Recent Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have identified four low-penetrance ovarian cancer susceptibility loci. We hypothesized that further moderate- or low-penetrance variants exist among the subset of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) not well tagged by the genotyping arrays used in the previous studies, which would account for some of the remaining risk. We therefore conducted a time- and cost-effective stage 1 GWAS on 342 invasive serous cases and 643 controls genotyped on pooled DNA using the high-density Illumina 1M-Duo array. We followed up 20 of the most significantly associated SNPs, which are not well tagged by the lower density arrays used by the published GWAS, and genotyping them on individual DNA. Most of the top 20 SNPs were clearly validated by individually genotyping the samples used in the pools. However, none of the 20 SNPs replicated when tested for association in a much larger stage 2 set of 4,651 cases and 6,966 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Given that most of the top 20 SNPs from pooling were validated in the same samples by individual genotyping, the lack of replication is likely to be due to the relatively small sample size in our stage 1 GWAS rather than due to problems with the pooling approach. We conclude that there are unlikely to be any moderate or large effects on ovarian cancer risk untagged by less dense arrays. However, our study lacked power to make clear statements on the existence of hitherto untagged small-effect variants.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22794196 PMCID: PMC3785301 DOI: 10.1017/thg.2012.38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet ISSN: 1832-4274 Impact factor: 1.587