Literature DB >> 22791186

Impact of climate change and prey abundance on nesting success of a top predator, the goshawk.

Aleksi Lehikoinen1, Andreas Lindén, Patrik Byholm, Esa Ranta, Pertti Saurola, Jari Valkama, Veijo Kaitala, Harto Lindén.   

Abstract

Contemporary research has documented a large number of shifts in spring phenology and changes in distribution range although the average spring temperatures have increased by only 0.3-0.6 °C over the past 100 years. Generally, earlier breeding birds have larger clutch sizes, and the advancing spring could thus potentially increase breeding success. Shifts in spring phenology can, however, be crucial for bird reproduction, and mistiming the breeding event may even have negative consequences for population development. Our aim was to explore how weather and prey abundance relates to the breeding performance of a north European top predator, the northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis. Our nationwide dataset from Finland, spanning the period 1989-2004, shows that ambient weather has a greater impact on the timing and success of breeding than the density of grouse Tetraonidae, the main prey of goshawks. Higher early spring temperatures were associated with advancing hatching date of goshawks. Correspondingly, grouse density and temperature during laying and brooding were positively associated with brood size, while precipitation showed a negative connection. Applying our models to a future scenario of climate warming, combined with a 50 % reduction in grouse density, suggests that average breeding dates will advance only 2.5 days and average breeding success would remain the same. Notably, breeding success was not spatially equal throughout Finland, as northern and eastern populations suffered most from declining grouse densities. The observed pattern is thus the opposite to what is expected from a population situated at the northern edge of its distribution range, and thus may help to understand why populations may not increase at the northern edge of their thermal distribution due to climate change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22791186     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2411-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Bird population trends are linearly affected by climate change along species thermal ranges.

Authors:  Frédéric Jiguet; Vincent Devictor; Richard Ottvall; Chris Van Turnhout; Henk Van der Jeugd; Ake Lindström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Christiaan Both; Sandra Bouwhuis; C M Lessells; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Model selection in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jerald B Johnson; Kristian S Omland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations?

Authors:  Christiaan Both; Margriet van Asch; Rob G Bijlsma; Arnold B van den Burg; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Fluctuating food supply affects the clutch size of Tengmalm's owl independent of laying date.

Authors:  Erkki Korpimäki; Harri Hakkarainen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Interactions between habitat heterogeneity and food affect reproductive output in a top predator.

Authors:  Patrik Byholm; Ari Nikula; Jussi Kentta; Jukka-Pekka Taivalmäki
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse.

Authors:  Gilbert X Ludwig; Rauno V Alatalo; Pekka Helle; Harto Lindén; Jan Lindström; Heli Siitari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Food regulates reproduction differently in different habitats: experimental evidence in the Goshawk.

Authors:  Patrik Byholm; Mari Kekkonen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Monitoring birds of prey in Finland: a summary of methods, trends, and statistical power.

Authors:  Pertti Saurola
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.129

View more
  5 in total

1.  Asymmetric competition impacts evolutionary rescue in a changing environment.

Authors:  Courtney L Van Den Elzen; Elizabeth J Kleynhans; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Diet shift induced rapid evolution of size and function in a predatory bird.

Authors:  Risto Tornberg; Laura Liuska; Seppo Rytkönen; Marko Mutanen; Panu Välimäki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Are life history events of a northern breeding population of Cooper's Hawks influenced by changing climate?

Authors:  Robert N Rosenfield; Madeline G Hardin; John Bielefeldt; Edward R Keyel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Current and future suitability of wintering grounds for a long-distance migratory raptor.

Authors:  Christina Kassara; Laura Gangoso; Ugo Mellone; Gvido Piasevoli; Thomas G Hadjikyriakou; Nikos Tsiopelas; Sinos Giokas; Pascual López-López; Vicente Urios; Jordi Figuerola; Rafa Silva; Willem Bouten; Alexander N G Kirschel; Munir Z Virani; Wolfgang Fiedler; Peter Berthold; Marion Gschweng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Interactive influences of fluctuations of main food resources and climate change on long-term population decline of Tengmalm's owls in the boreal forest.

Authors:  Marek Kouba; Luděk Bartoš; Jitka Bartošová; Kari Hongisto; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.