Literature DB >> 18771506

Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations?

Christiaan Both1, Margriet van Asch, Rob G Bijlsma, Arnold B van den Burg, Marcel E Visser.   

Abstract

1. Climate change has been shown to affect the phenology of many organisms, but interestingly these shifts are often unequal across trophic levels, causing a mismatch between the phenology of organisms and their food. 2. We consider two alternative hypotheses: consumers are constrained to adjust sufficiently to the lower trophic level, or prey species react more strongly than their predators to reduce predation. We discuss both hypotheses with our analyses of changes in phenology across four trophic levels: tree budburst, peak biomass of herbivorous caterpillars, breeding phenology of four insectivorous bird species and an avian predator. 3. In our long-term study, we show that between 1988 and 2005, budburst advanced (not significantly) with 0.17 d yr(-1), while between 1985 and 2005 both caterpillars (0.75 d year(-1)) and the hatching date of the passerine species (range for four species: 0.36-0.50 d year(-1)) have advanced, whereas raptor hatching dates showed no trend. 4. The caterpillar peak date was closely correlated with budburst date, as were the passerine hatching dates with the peak caterpillar biomass date. In all these cases, however, the slopes were significantly less than unity, showing that the response of the consumers is weaker than that of their food. This was also true for the avian predator, for which hatching dates were not correlated with the peak availability of fledgling passerines. As a result, the match between food demand and availability deteriorated over time for both the passerines and the avian predators. 5. These results could equally well be explained by consumers' insufficient responses as a consequence of constraints in adapting to climate change, or by them trying to escape predation from a higher trophic level, or both. Selection on phenology could thus be both from matches of phenology with higher and lower levels, and quantifying these can shed new light on why some organisms do adjust their phenology to climate change, while others do not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18771506     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01458.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  117 in total

1.  Disentangling the paradox of insect phenology: are temporal trends reflecting the response to warming?

Authors:  Elizabeth R Ellwood; Jeffrey M Diez; Inés Ibáñez; Richard B Primack; Hiromi Kobori; Hiroyoshi Higuchi; John A Silander
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jessica Forrest; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change.

Authors:  Gian-Reto Walther
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The potential impact of global warming on the efficacy of field margins sown for the conservation of bumble-bees.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Claire Carvell; Richard F Pywell; Paul G Craze
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Environmental controls on the phenology of moths: predicting plasticity and constraint under climate change.

Authors:  Anu Valtonen; Matthew P Ayres; Heikki Roininen; Juha Pöyry; Reima Leinonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Global metabolic impacts of recent climate warming.

Authors:  Michael E Dillon; George Wang; Raymond B Huey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Climate warming, ecological mismatch at arrival and population decline in migratory birds.

Authors:  Nicola Saino; Roberto Ambrosini; Diego Rubolini; Jost von Hardenberg; Antonello Provenzale; Kathrin Hüppop; Ommo Hüppop; Aleksi Lehikoinen; Esa Lehikoinen; Kalle Rainio; Maria Romano; Leonid Sokolov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Intra-guild interactions and projected impact of climate and land use changes on North American pochard ducks.

Authors:  Guillaume Péron; David N Koons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Climate change effects on migration phenology may mismatch brood parasitic cuckoos and their hosts.

Authors:  Nicola Saino; Diego Rubolini; Esa Lehikoinen; Leonid V Sokolov; Andrea Bonisoli-Alquati; Roberto Ambrosini; Giuseppe Boncoraglio; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Priority effects and habitat complexity affect the strength of competition.

Authors:  Shane Wallace Geange; Adrian C Stier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.