Literature DB >> 22790611

Psychometric properties and osteoprotective behaviors among type 2 diabetic patients: osteoporosis self-efficacy scale Malay version (OSES-M).

S A Abdulameer1, S A Syed Sulaiman, M A Hassali, K Subramaniam, M N Sahib.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM), only 22 % have normal bone mineral density and almost three quarters of the sample population had low self-efficacy towards osteoporosis. These results reflect the need for screening and educational programs to increase the awareness of T2DM towards osteoporosis.
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to translate and examine the psychometric properties of the Malay version of the osteoporosis self-efficacy scale (OSES-M) among T2DM and to determine the best cut-off value with optimum sensitivity and specificity. In addition, to assess factors that affects diabetic patients' osteoporosis self-efficacy.
METHODS: A standard "forward-backward" procedure was used to translate the OSES into Malay language, which was then validated with a convenience sample of 250 T2DM. The sensitivity and specificity of the OSES-M was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Bivariate and multivariate approaches were used to examine multiple independent variables on each dependent variable.
RESULTS: The mean score of OSES-M was 731.74 ± 197.15. Fleiss' kappa, content validity ratio range, and content validity index were 0.99, 0.75-1, and 0.96, respectively. Two factors were extracted from exploratory factor analysis and were confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. The optimum cut-off point of OSES-M to predict osteoporosis/osteopenia was 858. Regression analysis revealed that knowledge, health belief, and some demographic data had an impact on OSES-M.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the OSES-M is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring osteoporosis self-efficacy in the Malaysian clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790611     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2071-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of an osteoporosis prevention education programme for young adults.

Authors:  Moon Fai Chan; Wing Suet Kwong; Yu-Li Zang; Po Yuk Wan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.

Authors:  Holli A DeVon; Michelle E Block; Patricia Moyle-Wright; Diane M Ernst; Susan J Hayden; Deborah J Lazzara; Suzanne M Savoy; Elizabeth Kostas-Polston
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results.

Authors:  D L Simel; J R Feussner; E R DeLong; D B Matchar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1987 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.

Authors:  Diane Wild; Alyson Grove; Mona Martin; Sonya Eremenco; Sandra McElroy; Aneesa Verjee-Lorenz; Pennifer Erikson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Calcium intake and body weight.

Authors:  K M Davies; R P Heaney; R R Recker; J M Lappe; M J Barger-Lux; K Rafferty; S Hinders
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  [Prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women].

Authors:  J Reyes Balaguer; J Moreno Olmos
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 8.  The burden of osteoporosis: cost.

Authors:  R Lindsay
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Ten-year experience with an exercise-based outpatient life-style modification program in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S H Schneider; A K Khachadurian; L F Amorosa; L Clemow; N B Ruderman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Effects of aerobic exercise on lipids and lipoproteins in adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  G A Kelley; K S Kelley
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.427

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Cognitive perspective of osteoporosis among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Malaysian case.

Authors:  Shaymaa Abdalwahed Abdulameer; Mohanad Naji Sahib; Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Validation and Assessment of Osteoporosis Self-Efficacy Among Iraqi General Population.

Authors:  Mohanad Naji Sahib
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2018-05-31

4.  A comprehensive view of knowledge and osteoporosis status among type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysia: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Shaymaa A Abdulameer; Mohanad N Sahib; Syed A Syed Sulaiman; Mohamed A Hassali
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2019-12-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.