Literature DB >> 22786909

Confocal comparison of corneal nerve regeneration and keratocyte reaction between FS-LASIK, OUP-SBK, and conventional LASIK.

Fengju Zhang1, Shijing Deng, Ning Guo, Mengmeng Wang, Xuguang Sun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the regeneration characteristics of injured corneal subbasal nerve fibers (CSNFs) and keratocyte reaction following LASIK with a femtosecond laser (FS-LASIK), One Use-Plus Sub-Bowman's keratomileusis (OUP-SBK), and M2 90 microkeratome to provide a more suitable treatment strategy.
METHODS: A total of 22 eyes that underwent FS-LASIK, 32 eyes that underwent OUP-SBK, and 26 eyes that underwent conventional LASIK were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Morphologic modifications of corneal architecture were evaluated postsurgically at 1, 3, and 6 months, and comparisons were made by ANOVA analysis.
RESULTS: The density of stromal keratocytes in the FS-LASIK group was higher than that of OUP-SBK and conventional LASIK groups at 1 month postsurgery (P < 0.05), while in the OUP-SBK group it was higher than that of the FS-LASIK and conventional LASIK groups at 3 months postsurgery (P < 0.05). Regeneration of CSNFs was detected in 90% of eyes in all three groups around 3 mm of the peripheral flap at 1 month postoperation. CSNFs in 6.3% of the eyes in the OUP-SBK group were even observed around the peripheral flap at 6 mm 3 months after surgery, CSNFs were found in 62.5% of eyes (conventional LASIK), 72% of eyes (OUP-SBK), and 64.3% of eyes (FS-LASIK) around 3 mm near the center of the flap. While at 6 months, CSNFs were found in 100% of the eyes in all three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Keratocyte reactions after FS-LASIK and OUP-SBK were a little more severe than that after conventional LASIK. The repairing velocity of subbasal nerve fibers in the OUP-SBK group was a little faster than that of the FS and conventional LASIK groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22786909     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  8 in total

1.  Corneal regeneration after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Manli Liu; Ting Zhang; Yugui Zhou; Yuan Sun; Danyang Wang; Hua Zheng; Quan Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  In vivo confocal laser microscopy of morphologic changes after small incision lenticule extraction with accelerated cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) in patients with thin corneas and high myopia.

Authors:  Yugui Zhou; Manli Liu; Ting Zhang; Hua Zheng; Yuan Sun; Xiaonan Yang; Shengbei Weng; Haiqin Lin; Quan Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 4.  In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Cruzat; Yureeda Qazi; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Assessments of tear meniscus height, tear film thickness, and corneal epithelial thickness after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Wen-Jia Xie; Ye-Sheng Xu; Xia Zhang; Yu-Feng Yao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Mar.       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Changes in the micromorphology of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus in patients after plaque brachytherapy.

Authors:  Andrey Zhivov; Karsten Winter; Sabine Peschel; Oliver Stachs; Andreas Wree; Guido Hildebrandt; Rudolf Guthoff
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Authors:  Meiyan Li; Lingling Niu; Bing Qin; Zimei Zhou; Katherine Ni; Qihua Le; Jun Xiang; Anji Wei; Weiping Ma; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Miao He; Wenyong Huang; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.