PURPOSE: The posterior sclera has a major biomechanical influence on the optic nerve head, and may therefore be important in glaucoma. Scleral material properties are influenced significantly by collagen fiber architecture. Here we quantitatively map fiber orientation in non-glaucoma and glaucoma posterior human sclerae. METHODS: Wide-angle x-ray scattering quantified fiber orientation at 0.5-mm intervals across seven non-glaucoma post-mortem human sclerae, and five sclerae with glaucoma history and confirmed axon loss. Multiphoton microscopy provided semiquantitative depth-profiling in the peripapillary sclera. RESULTS: Midposterior fiber orientation was either uniaxial (one preferred direction) or biaxial (two directions). The peripapillary sclera was characterized by a ring of fibers located mainly in the mid-/outer stromal depth and encompassing ∼50% of the total tissue thickness. Fiber anisotropy was 37% higher in the peripapillary sclera compared with midposterior, varied up to 4-fold with position around the scleral canal, and was consistently lowest in the superior-nasal quadrant. Mean fiber anisotropy was significantly lower in the superior-temporal (P < 0.01) and inferior-nasal (P < 0.05) peripapillary scleral quadrants in glaucoma compared with non-glaucoma eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The collagen fiber architecture of the posterior human sclera is highly anisotropic and inhomogeneous. Regional differences in peripapillary fiber anisotropy between non-glaucoma and glaucoma eyes may represent adaptive changes in response to elevated IOP and/or glaucoma, or baseline structural properties that associate with predisposition to glaucomatous axon damage. Quantitative fiber orientation data will benefit numerical eye models aimed at predicting the sclera's influence on nerve head biomechanics, and thereby its possible role in glaucoma.
PURPOSE: The posterior sclera has a major biomechanical influence on the optic nerve head, and may therefore be important in glaucoma. Scleral material properties are influenced significantly by collagen fiber architecture. Here we quantitatively map fiber orientation in non-glaucoma and glaucoma posterior human sclerae. METHODS: Wide-angle x-ray scattering quantified fiber orientation at 0.5-mm intervals across seven non-glaucoma post-mortem human sclerae, and five sclerae with glaucoma history and confirmed axon loss. Multiphoton microscopy provided semiquantitative depth-profiling in the peripapillary sclera. RESULTS: Midposterior fiber orientation was either uniaxial (one preferred direction) or biaxial (two directions). The peripapillary sclera was characterized by a ring of fibers located mainly in the mid-/outer stromal depth and encompassing ∼50% of the total tissue thickness. Fiber anisotropy was 37% higher in the peripapillary sclera compared with midposterior, varied up to 4-fold with position around the scleral canal, and was consistently lowest in the superior-nasal quadrant. Mean fiber anisotropy was significantly lower in the superior-temporal (P < 0.01) and inferior-nasal (P < 0.05) peripapillary scleral quadrants in glaucoma compared with non-glaucoma eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The collagen fiber architecture of the posterior human sclera is highly anisotropic and inhomogeneous. Regional differences in peripapillary fiber anisotropy between non-glaucoma and glaucoma eyes may represent adaptive changes in response to elevated IOP and/or glaucoma, or baseline structural properties that associate with predisposition to glaucomatous axon damage. Quantitative fiber orientation data will benefit numerical eye models aimed at predicting the sclera's influence on nerve head biomechanics, and thereby its possible role in glaucoma.
Authors: Richard E Norman; John G Flanagan; Ian A Sigal; Sophie M K Rausch; Inka Tertinegg; C Ross Ethier Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: J Crawford Downs; J-K Francis Suh; Kevin A Thomas; Anthony J Bellezza; Richard T Hart; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ning-Jiun Jan; Jonathan L Grimm; Huong Tran; Kira L Lathrop; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman; Ian A Sigal Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Ian A Sigal; Jonathan L Grimm; Ning-Jiun Jan; Korey Reid; Don S Minckler; Donald J Brown Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Forest L Danford; Dongmei Yan; Robert A Dreier; Thomas M Cahir; Christopher A Girkin; Jonathan P Vande Geest Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jacek K Pijanka; Petar P Markov; Dan Midgett; Neil G Paterson; Nick White; Emma J Blain; Thao D Nguyen; Harry A Quigley; Craig Boote Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Ian C Campbell; Baptiste Coudrillier; Johanne Mensah; Richard L Abel; C Ross Ethier Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Benjamin Cruz Perez; Junhua Tang; Hugh J Morris; Joel R Palko; Xueliang Pan; Richard T Hart; Jun Liu Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Mary E Pease; Ericka N Oglesby; Elizabeth Cone-Kimball; Joan L Jefferys; Matthew R Steinhart; Anthony J Kim; Justin Hanes; Harry A Quigley Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 4.799