Literature DB >> 22785604

Characterized chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint: an up to 4-year follow-up of a prospective cohort of 38 patients.

Johan J E Vanlauwe1, Tom Claes, Dieter Van Assche, Johan Bellemans, Frank P Luyten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is an accepted treatment option for selected condylar cartilage defects in the knee. Results for patellofemoral chondral defects have been less favorable. HYPOTHESIS: Autologous chondrocyte implantation with characterized chondrocytes will result in clinically relevant improvement in patellofemoral lesions. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Patients with symptomatic patellofemoral full-thickness cartilage lesions were treated with ACI using characterized chondrocytes (ChondroCelect) covered with a collagen type I membrane. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Responders were defined using 5 categories (≥10 points and ≥20%, 30%, 50%, 70%) based on the KOOS and VAS. Treatment failure was defined as partial loosening of more than 20% of the graft with subsequent procedures to the subchondral bone.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients, with a mean defect size of 4.89 cm(2) (range, 1.5-11 cm(2)), were treated for a patellar defect (n = 28), trochlear defect (n = 7), or a kissing lesion (trochlea and patella; n = 3). The minimum follow-up period was 24 months (mean, 37 months; range, 24-72 months). Treated patients showed statistically significant improvements in the KOOS (at 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months) and VAS (at the same time points) compared with pretreatment for each time point. Responder analysis identified approximately 84% of patients with a clinically relevant improvement greater than 10 points at 3 years. Treatment failure was observed in 5 patients. The most commonly reported adverse events were joint crepitation (n = 18) and arthrofibrosis (n = 7). No relationship could be found between clinical outcome and anatomic characteristics of the patellofemoral joint, lesion size and site, time since onset, or age. Nine patients required additional surgery: 6 because of persistent symptoms and 3 for hardware removal.
CONCLUSION: Characterized chondrocyte implantation resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement over time. These results add to the evidence demonstrating that ACI is a valuable cartilage repair technique for patellofemoral lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22785604     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512452712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

1.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) for chondral defects in the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Daniel Meyerkort; Jay R Ebert; Timothy R Ackland; William B Robertson; Michael Fallon; M H Zheng; David J Wood
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation: Is it likely to become a saviour of large-sized and full-thickness cartilage defect in young adult knee?

Authors:  Chi Zhang; You-Zhi Cai; Xiang-Jin Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Early osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Arendt; Massimo Berruto; Giuseppe Filardo; Mario Ronga; Stefano Zaffagnini; Jack Farr; Paolo Ferrua; Alberto Grassi; Vincenzo Condello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The evaluation and management of cartilage lesions affecting the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Eric J Strauss; David K Galos
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

5.  Arthroscopic Treatment of Patellar and Trochlear Cartilage Lesions with Matrix Encapsulated Chondrocyte Implantation versus Microfracture: Quantitative Assessment with MRI T2-Mapping and MOCART at 4-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Anell Olivos Meza; Socorro Cortés González; Jairo José Ferniza Garza; Francisco Javier Pérez Jiménez; Villalobos Córdova Enrique; Clemente Ibarra
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.

Authors:  William L Sheppard; Betina B Hinckel; Armin Arshi; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Cartilage Restoration of Patellofemoral Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Renato Andrade; Joni Nunes; Betina B Hinckel; Jordan Gruskay; Sebastiano Vasta; Ricardo Bastos; J Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Andreas H Gomoll; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Cell therapy in joint disorders.

Authors:  Peter D Counsel; Daniel Bates; Richard Boyd; David A Connell
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  A 5-year follow-up after cartilage repair in the knee using a platelet-rich plasma-immersed polymer-based implant.

Authors:  Alberto Siclari; Gennaro Mascaro; Christian Kaps; Eugenio Boux
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-10-17

Review 10.  Treatment of Failed Articular Cartilage Reconstructive Procedures of the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joseph D Lamplot; Kevin A Schafer; Matthew J Matava
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.