Literature DB >> 22784899

Treatment of delayed and nonunited fractures and osteotomies with pulsed electromagnetic field in children and adolescents.

Melissa Y Boyette1, Jose A Herrera-Soto.   

Abstract

Nonunion of fractures or osteotomies in the pediatric population is rare. The gold standard for the treatment of nonunions involves harvesting autologous iliac crest bone graft and sometimes internal fixation, which are invasive procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field on a non-united fracture or osteotomy in the pediatric population. A retrospective study was performed on all patients at the authors' institution who used pulsed electromagnetic field as part of their treatment for nonunion or delayed union. Success of the initial nonunion treatment was defined as complete union of the fracture or osteotomy site. Two types of treatment were administered once delayed bone healing was identified: pulsed electromagnetic field alone or pulsed electromagnetic field plus an adjunct treatment. Twenty-one patients were included; 8 osteotomies and 14 fractures developed a nonunion. Average patient age was 11.7 years. Average age for patients who healed with the initial treatment was 10.7 years, whereas nonhealers had an average age of 14 years. Eighty-nine percent of osteotomy nonunions healed with their first management. Fifty-seven percent of fracture nonunions healed at the first attempt. The use of pulsed electromagnetic field is a good option for the initial treatment of pediatric nonunions, especially for patients who develop nonunions secondary to osteotomies. Adding bone marrow aspiration improves the outcomes and is minimally invasive compared with autologous iliac crest bone graft, with no complications. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22784899     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120621-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biophysical regulation of stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Peter M Govey; Alayna E Loiselle; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Impact of electromagnetic fields on stem cells: common mechanisms at the crossroad between adult neurogenesis and osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lucia Leone; Maria Vittoria Podda; Claudio Grassi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  Topical cutaneous application of carbon dioxide via a hydrogel for improved fracture repair: results of phase I clinical safety trial.

Authors:  Takahiro Niikura; Takashi Iwakura; Takashi Omori; Sang Yang Lee; Yoshitada Sakai; Toshihiro Akisue; Keisuke Oe; Tomoaki Fukui; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Patient-dependent factors for fractures union failure among Riyadh population 2016.

Authors:  Mohammed Aldhafian; Faisal Alotaibi; Azam Alzahrani; Hareth Almajid; Abdullah Alamri; Ahmad Aljandal; Feras Alamri; Fares Alhawas; Amar Fathi M Khalifa
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-12-31

6.  Pentoxifylline and electromagnetic field improved bone fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Yusuf Atalay; Nedim Gunes; Mehmet Dervis Guner; Veysi Akpolat; Mustafa Salih Celik; Rezzan Guner
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.162

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.