Literature DB >> 22784897

Mini-midvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in TKA: muscle damage and inflammation markers.

Zeyu Huang1, Bin Shen, Jun Ma, Jing Yang, Zongke Zhou, Pengde Kang, Fuxing Pei.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze the biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients treated with the mini-midvastus approach or the medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty. Of 60 patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty, 30 were treated with the mini-midvastus approach (MMV group) and 30 were treated with the medial parapatellar approach (MPP group). Serum creatine kinase, myoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β levels were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (except for C-reactive protein level), and on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Student's t test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the outcomes between the 2 groups. Compared with the MPP group, a significant increase in serum creatine kinase level existed in the MMV group on postoperative days 2 (P=.08) and 3 (P=.09) and cumulatively (P=.02). However, significantly elevated C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels existed in the MPP group.According to the serum creatine kinase levels, the mini-midvastus approach has no superiority over the medial parapatellar approach in terms of sparing muscle and may cause more muscle damage. Further study is warranted to determine the correlation between biochemical markers and functional deficits. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22784897     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120621-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  No Correlation Between Serum Markers and Early Functional Outcome After Contemporary THA.

Authors:  Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Michael J Taunton; Atul F Kamath; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus conventional approaches in total knee replacement/arthroplasty: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Themistoklis Tzatzairis; Aliki Fiska; Athanasios Ververidis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

3.  Blood management of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty in a single hospitalization period.

Authors:  Jun Ma; ZeYu Huang; Bin Shen; FuXing Pei
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Correlations between inflammatory cytokines, muscle damage markers and acute postoperative pain following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Si; Ti-Min Yang; Yi Zeng; Zong-Ke Zhou; Fu-Xing Pei; Yan-Rong Lu; Jing-Qiu Cheng; Bin Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Overview of Methods to Quantify Invasiveness of Surgical Approaches in Orthopedic Surgery-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Niels Buis; Hooman Esfandiari; Armando Hoch; Philipp Fürnstahl
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 6.  Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Total Knee Arthroplasty by Different Surgical Approaches: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Long Zhao; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jian-Ke Pan; Gui-Hong Liang; He-Tao Huang; Wei-Yi Yang; Ming-Hui Luo; Jun Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.