Literature DB >> 22784353

Enzymatic excision of uracil residues in nucleosomes depends on the local DNA structure and dynamics.

Yu Ye1, Mary R Stahley, Jianqing Xu, Joshua I Friedman, Yan Sun, Jeffrey N McKnight, Jeffrey J Gray, Gregory D Bowman, James T Stivers.   

Abstract

The excision of uracil bases from DNA is accomplished by the enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG). Recognition of uracil bases in free DNA is facilitated by uracil base pair dynamics, but it is not known whether this same mechanistic feature is relevant for detection and excision of uracil residues embedded in nucleosomes. Here we investigate this question using nucleosome core particles (NCPs) generated from Xenopus laevis histones and the high-affinity "Widom 601" positioning sequence. The reactivity of uracil residues in NCPs under steady-state multiple-turnover conditions was generally decreased compared to that of free 601 DNA, mostly because of anticipated steric effects of histones. However, some sites in NCPs had equal or even greater reactivity than free DNA, and the observed reactivities were not readily explained by simple steric considerations or by global DNA unwrapping models for nucleosome invasion. In particular, some reactive uracils were found in occluded positions, while some unreactive uracils were found in exposed positions. One feature of many exposed reactive sites is a wide DNA minor groove, which allows penetration of a key active site loop of the enzyme. In single-turnover kinetic measurements, multiphasic reaction kinetics were observed for several uracil sites, where each kinetic transient was independent of the UNG concentration. These kinetic measurements, and supporting structural analyses, support a mechanism in which some uracils are transiently exposed to UNG by local, rate-limiting nucleosome conformational dynamics, followed by rapid trapping of the exposed state by the enzyme. We present structural models and plausible reaction mechanisms for the reaction of UNG at three distinct uracil sites in the NCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22784353      PMCID: PMC3448002          DOI: 10.1021/bi3006412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  45 in total

1.  Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites.

Authors:  J D Anderson; J Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Stressing-out DNA? The contribution of serine-phosphodiester interactions in catalysis by uracil DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  R M Werner; Y L Jiang; R G Gordley; G J Jagadeesh; J E Ladner; G Xiao; M Tordova; G L Gilliland; J T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Presteady-state analysis of a single catalytic turnover by Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase reveals a "pinch-pull-push" mechanism.

Authors:  Isaac Wong; Amy J Lundquist; Andrew S Bernards; Dale W Mosbaugh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase-DNA substrate and product structures: conformational strain promotes catalytic efficiency by coupled stereoelectronic effects.

Authors:  S S Parikh; G Walcher; G D Jones; G Slupphaug; H E Krokan; G M Blackburn; J A Tainer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Turning On uracil-DNA glycosylase using a pyrene nucleotide switch.

Authors:  Y L Jiang; K Kwon; J T Stivers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Dynamics of nucleosome invasion by DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  Hannah S Tims; Kaushik Gurunathan; Marcia Levitus; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Mutational analysis of the base-flipping mechanism of uracil DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Yu Lin Jiang; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution.

Authors:  Curt A Davey; David F Sargent; Karolin Luger; Armin W Maeder; Timothy J Richmond
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A map of minor groove shape and electrostatic potential from hydroxyl radical cleavage patterns of DNA.

Authors:  Eric P Bishop; Remo Rohs; Stephen C J Parker; Sean M West; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig; Thomas D Tullius
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  Benchmarking and analysis of protein docking performance in Rosetta v3.2.

Authors:  Sidhartha Chaudhury; Monica Berrondo; Brian D Weitzner; Pravin Muthu; Hannah Bergman; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Human cells contain a factor that facilitates the DNA glycosylase-mediated excision of oxidized bases from occluded sites in nucleosomes.

Authors:  R L Maher; C G Marsden; A M Averill; S S Wallace; J B Sweasy; D S Pederson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-07-05

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  Molecular crowding enhances facilitated diffusion of two human DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Shannen L Cravens; Joseph D Schonhoft; Meng M Rowland; Alyssa A Rodriguez; Breeana G Anderson; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The Human Ligase IIIα-XRCC1 Protein Complex Performs DNA Nick Repair after Transient Unwrapping of Nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; Ishtiaque Rashid; Alan E Tomkinson; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Nucleosomes suppress the formation of double-strand DNA breaks during attempted base excision repair of clustered oxidative damages.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; Betty P Tsang; Susan S Wallace; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Nucleosomes and the three glycosylases: High, medium, and low levels of excision by the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily.

Authors:  Mary E Tarantino; Blaine J Dow; Alexander C Drohat; Sarah Delaney
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-09-20

7.  Distinguishing Specific and Nonspecific Complexes of Alkyladenine DNA Glycosylase.

Authors:  Erin L Taylor; Preethi M Kesavan; Abigail E Wolfe; Patrick J O'Brien
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Diverse fates of uracilated HIV-1 DNA during infection of myeloid lineage cells.

Authors:  Erik C Hansen; Monica Ransom; Jay R Hesselberth; Nina N Hosmane; Adam A Capoferri; Katherine M Bruner; Ross A Pollack; Hao Zhang; Michael Bradley Drummond; Janet M Siliciano; Robert Siliciano; James T Stivers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Unencumbered Pol β lyase activity in nucleosome core particles.

Authors:  Yesenia Rodriguez; Michael J Howard; Matthew J Cuneo; Rajendra Prasad; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Comparative Effects of Ions, Molecular Crowding, and Bulk DNA on the Damage Search Mechanisms of hOGG1 and hUNG.

Authors:  Shannen L Cravens; James T Stivers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.