Literature DB >> 22782916

Relationship between prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) and characteristics of tumor aggressiveness.

Herbert Augustin1, Katrin Mayrhofer, Karl Pummer, Sebastian Mannweiler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data supporting prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) as prognostic marker are still inconsistent. With special emphasis to Gleason pattern specific tumor volumes (TVs) the relationships between PCA3 score and different characteristics of tumor aggressiveness were meticulously analyzed.
METHODS: In 127 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer, urinary PCA3 score was quantified using Progensa™ PCA3 assay. Total TV and Gleason patterns' specific tumor volumes (GPTV) were assessed by computer-assisted planimetry. Spearman's rank correlations coefficients (r) were calculated to assess relationships between PCA3 and TV as well as GPTV. Regression analyses were performed to estimate the relationship between PCA3 and TV as well as non-organ confined disease.
RESULTS: Mean patients' age was 60.8 years. Patients showed a mean PSA level of 8.1 ng/ml and a mean PCA3 score of 68.5. PCA3 was not significantly correlated with TV (r = 0.131, P = 0.142). Stratified by Gleason score groups ≤ 6, 7, and ≥ 8, PCA3 showed no significant correlations with TV. In a subgroup analysis of 50 patients with different primary and secondary Gleason patterns there was neither a correlation with the primary GPTV (r = 0.071, P = 0.626) nor with the secondary GPTV (r = 0.052, P = 0.722). The PCA3 score was neither an independent predictor for TV nor for non-organ confined disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The PCA3 score did not show any significant correlation with TV, primary or secondary GPTV. Moreover, the PCA3 score was not an independent predictor for TV or for non-organ confined disease. Thus, the PCA3 score had no impact for the prediction of aggressive prostate cancers.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22782916     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  7 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel; Tracy M Downs; Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  A potential panel of four-long noncoding RNA signature in prostate cancer predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival.

Authors:  Tian-Bao Huang; Chuan-Peng Dong; Guang-Chen Zhou; Sheng-Ming Lu; Yang Luan; Xiao Gu; Lei Liu; Xue-Fei Ding
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Score Does Not Predict for Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy or for Progression-free Survival in Clinically Localized, Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Darlene Veruttipong; Jonathan W Said; Robert E Reiter; Michael L Steinberg; Christopher R King; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  PCA3 in the detection and management of early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Laura Foj; Montserrat Milà; Josep M Augé; Rafael Molina; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-03-16

Review 5.  Novel approaches for the identification of biomarkers of aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yunee Kim; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 11.117

6.  Novel three‑lncRNA signature predicts survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Kaixuan Wang; Janguo Fei; Yi Bao; Xiaoguang Wang; Zhengwei Song; Fei Chen; Jun Gao; Zhengxiang Zhong
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Comparative evaluation of urinary PCA3 and TMPRSS2: ERG scores and serum PHI in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lucile Tallon; Devillier Luangphakdy; Alain Ruffion; Marc Colombel; Marian Devonec; Denis Champetier; Philippe Paparel; Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci; Paul Perrin; Virginie Vlaeminck-Guillem
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.