| Literature DB >> 22779012 |
Kamiar Zomorodian1, Mohammad Jamal Saharkhiz, Samaneh Shariati, Keyvan Pakshir, Mohammad Javad Rahimi, Reza Khashei.
Abstract
Nepeta cataria L. is traditionally consumed as a food additive. The effects of three different harvest stages of N. cataria essential oils (EOs) against most common causes of food-borne infections were evaluated by broth microdilution method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The chemical composition of the EOs from N. cataria has been analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The analysis of the EOs indicated that 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-nepetalactone (55-58%) and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-nepetalactone (30-31.2%) were the major compounds of the EOs at all developmental stages. The results showed that the tested EOs exhibited antimicrobial activities against the food-borne pathogens at concentrations of 0.125-2 μL/mL. Based on these results, the EO of N. cataria can possibly be used in food products as a natural preservative agent.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22779012 PMCID: PMC3385634 DOI: 10.5402/2012/591953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pharm ISSN: 2090-6145
EO composition (%) of catnip (N. cataria) at three stages of harvest.
| Component | RIa | Vegetative (%) | Floral budding (%) | Full flowering (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 936 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 4.6 |
| Sabinene | 957 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.15 |
|
| 978 | 0.8 | 1.13 | 1.64 |
| 1-Cyclohexen-1-yl-methyl ketone | 980 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Triplal | 1023 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Thymol | 1294 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.57 |
| 4a- | 1332 | 55 | 58 | 55.03 |
| 4a- | 1342 | 30.06 | 31.1 | 31.2 |
| trans Caryophyllene | 1430 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 2.1 |
|
| 1446 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.87 |
| 11-Dodecenol | 1500 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 1.1 |
| Spathulenol | 1580 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1569 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.12 |
| 6,10-dimethyl-2-undecane | 1907 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.25 |
aRetention index.
Antimicrobial activity (MIC and MBC) of essential oils distilled from N. cataria's stages against food-borne pathogens.
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria (number of strains) | MICa ( | MMCb ( | MICa ( | MMCb ( | MICa ( | MICb ( | |
| GMc (range) | GMc (range) | GMc (range) | GMc (range) | GMc (range) | GMc (range) | ||
| Bacteria | Methicillin resistant | 0.22 (0.125–0.5) | 1.12 (1-2) | 0.17 (0.125–0.5) | 1.41 (1-2) | 0.28 (0.25–0.5) | 1.41 (1-2) |
| Methicillin sensitive | 0.19 (0.125–0.5) | 0.89 (0.5–2) | 0.15 (0.125–0.25) | 1.26 (1-2) | 0.22 (0.125–0.5) | 1.41 (1–4) | |
|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 | |
| Third generation cephalosporins resistance | 3.48 (2–4) | 6.96 (4–8) | 3.48 (2–4) | 6.96 (4–8) | 3.03 (2–4) | 5.65 (2–8) | |
| Third generation cephalosporins sensitive | 4 (2–8) | 8.98 (4–16) | 3.56 (2–8) | 8.98 (4–16) | 3.17 (2–4) | 6.35 (2–8) | |
| Enterohemorrhagic | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 2 | |
|
| 0.5 (0.25–2) | 2 (1–4) | 0.5 (0.25–2) | 1.68 (1-2) | 0.42 (0.25–2) | 1 (0.5–2) | |
|
| 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| |||||||
| Fungi |
| 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 |
|
| 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | |
|
| 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | |
|
| 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | |
|
| 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | |
a Minimum inhibitory concentration, bMinimum microbicidal concentration, cGeometric mean.