| Literature DB >> 35651766 |
Detelina Petrova1, Uroš Gašić2, Lyubomira Yocheva3, Anton Hinkov4, Zhenya Yordanova1, Ganka Chaneva1, Desislava Mantovska1, Momchil Paunov5, Lyubomira Ivanova1, Mariya Rogova1, Kalina Shishkova4, Daniel Todorov4, Anita Tosheva6, Veneta Kapchina-Toteva1, Valya Vassileva7, Atanas Atanassov8, Danijela Mišić2, Georgi Bonchev7, Miroslava Zhiponova1.
Abstract
Nepeta nuda (catmint; Lamiaceae) is a perennial medicinal plant with a wide geographic distribution in Europe and Asia. This study first characterized the taxonomic position of N. nuda using DNA barcoding technology. Since medicinal plants are rich in secondary metabolites contributing to their adaptive immune response, we explored the N. nuda metabolic adjustment operating under variable environments. Through comparative analysis of wild-grown and in vitro cultivated plants, we assessed the change in phenolic and iridoid compounds, and the associated immune activities. The wild-grown plants from different Bulgarian locations contained variable amounts of phenolic compounds manifested by a general increase in flowers, as compared to leaves, while a strong reduction was observed in the in vitro plants. A similar trend was noted for the antioxidant and anti-herpesvirus activity of the extracts. The antimicrobial potential, however, was very similar, regardless the growth conditions. Analysis of the N. nuda extracts led to identification of 63 compounds including phenolic acids and derivatives, flavonoids, and iridoids. Quantification of the content of 21 target compounds indicated their general reduction in the extracts from in vitro plants, and only the ferulic acid (FA) was specifically increased. Cultivation of in vitro plants under different light quality and intensity indicated that these variable light conditions altered the content of bioactive compounds, such as aesculin, FA, rosmarinic acid, cirsimaritin, naringenin, rutin, isoquercetin, epideoxyloganic acid, chlorogenic acid. Thus, this study generated novel information on the regulation of N. nuda productivity using light and other cultivation conditions, which could be exploited for biotechnological purposes.Entities:
Keywords: DNA barcoding; Nepeta nuda; antibacterial; antioxidant; antiviral; iridoids; light; phenolics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35651766 PMCID: PMC9150856 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.866777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Phylogenetic position of N. nuda compared to accessions from BOLD and NCBI GenBank based on nuclear DNA barcoding marker ITS. The tree was constructed using the UPGMA method and Tamura–Nei model. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Bootstrap values below 75% are not shown. The analyzed N. nuda sequence is depicted in red bold. Accessions from databases are shown with their respective numbers in BOLD and/or NCBI databases. The branch of accessions close to N. nuda is depicted in punctuated rectangle.
Figure 2Phylogenetic position of N. nuda against accessions from BOLD and NCBI GenBank based on chloroplast DNA barcoding markers rbcL (A), matK (B) and trnH-psbA (C) and a consensus tree of all three markers (D). The trees were constructed using the UPGMA method and Tamura–Nei model. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Bootstrap values below 75% are not shown. The analyzed N. nuda sequence is depicted in red bold. Accessions from databases are shown with their respective numbers in (A–C). In (D), punctuated rectangle points to species in closest proximity to N. nuda.
Figure 3Total phenolics in flowers and leaves of N. nuda in situ plants from different habitats. (A) Distribution map of N. nuda in Bulgaria shown in dark color according to Assyov et al. (2012). Arrows indicate the habitats of the studied in situ plants in Pirin, Rhodopes and Rila # 1 and Rila # 2. Samples of vouchers are deposited in the Herbarium of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski,” Sofia, Bulgaria. (B) Total content of phenolics in flowers and leaves from in situ populations: total phenolic content; total flavonoid content. Mean values ± SE (15 plants; n ≥ 3 technical repeats). One–way ANOVA (Holm–Sidak) test was applied to determine the statistical difference between the variants (shown in different letters).
Figure 4Nepeta nuda phenolics in in situ, in vitro and ex vitro growth conditions. (A) N. nuda variants: location and photograph of a plant from in situ population; in vitro plants at 5 weeks; ex vitro adapted plants for 1 year. (B) Total content of phenolics in flowers and leaves from in situ and ex vitro plants, and in vitro plants: total phenolic content; total flavonoid content. Mean values ± SE (15 plants; n ≥ 3 technical repeats). One-way ANOVA (Holm–Sidak) test was applied to determine the statistical difference between the variants (shown in different letters).
Antioxidant activity of N. nuda crude methanol extracts.
|
| |
|---|---|
| 128.59 ± 4.81b | |
| 107.11 ± 2.80c | |
|
| 60.81 ± 1.61e |
| 206.00 ± 2.80a | |
| 75.63 ± 0.98d |
One-way ANOVA (Holm-Sidak) test was applied to determine the statistical difference between the variants (shown in different letters).
Antiviral activity of N. nuda water extracts against HHV-1 (strain F).
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1.5 | 6.4 | 81.37 | 0.599 | 10.68 | 65.62 | 1.155 | 5.54 | |
| 2 | 5.2 | 75.18 | 0.725 | 7.17 | 43.87 | n.d. | n.d. | |
|
| 3 | 7.5 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| Positive control | ||||||||
| Acyclovir | 0.0312 | 0.341 | 97.315 | 0.00136 | 250.7 | 100 | 0.000609 | 559.93 |
SI (Selective Index)—the ratio of CC.
n.d., not detected.
Antibacterial activity of N. nuda methanol extracts.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
| 5/20 | 2.5/20 | 0.626/5 | 5/20 | |
| 1.25/10 | 2.5/20 | 1.25/10 | 5/20 | |
|
| 5/20 | 5/20 | 1.25/10 | 5/20 |
| Positive controls | MIC/MBC | |||
| penicillin G (μg ml−1) | – | – | <0.235 | <0.235 |
| gentamicin (μg ml−1) | 1.25 | 0.625 | – | – |
Values for minimum inhibitory (MIC) and lethal concentration (MBC, minimum bactericidal concentration) are presented as mg of extract per ml (mg ml.
Metabolites identified in N. nuda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Aesculetin | 19 | |||||||
| Aesculin | 11 | (11) | + | |||||
| Benzoic acid methyl ester | + | |||||||
| Benzoyl tartaric acid | 15 | |||||||
| Caffeic acid | 20 | (20) | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Caffeic acid hexoside 1 | 9 | |||||||
| Caffeic acid hexoside 2 | 13 | |||||||
| Caffeic acid hexuronide | 7 | |||||||
| Caffeoylmalic acid | + | |||||||
| Caffeoyl tartaric acid | 10 | |||||||
| Chlorogenic acid | (65 | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Cinnamic acid | + | + | ||||||
| Clinopodic acid A | 23 | |||||||
| Coumaric acid | + | |||||||
| Dicaffeoylquinic acid | + | |||||||
| Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside 1 | 5 | |||||||
| Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside 2 | 6 | |||||||
| Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside 3 | 12 | |||||||
| Dimethoxy cinnamic acid | + | |||||||
| Ethyl caffeate | 27 | |||||||
| Ferulic acid | 16 | (16) | + | + | + | + | ||
| Feruloyl tartaric acid | 14 | |||||||
| Gallic acid | (64 | + | ||||||
| Gallic acid hexoside 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Gallic acid hexoside 2 | 3 | |||||||
| Gentisic acid | 8 | |||||||
| Methyl 2-hydroxy-3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl) propanoate | 17 | |||||||
| Methyl rosmarinate | 24 | |||||||
| Methyl salvianolate C 1 | 29 | |||||||
| Methyl salvianolate C 2 | 30 | |||||||
| Nepetoidin B 1 | 22 | |||||||
| Nepetoidin B 2 | 28 | |||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| Protocatechuic acid | 2 | (2) | + | + | + | + | ||
| Salvianolic acid A | + | |||||||
| Salvianolic acid B | + | |||||||
| Salvianolic acid C | 26 | |||||||
| Umbelliferone | + | |||||||
| Rosmarinic acid | 18 | (18) | + | + | + | + | + | n.d. |
| Syringic acid | 21 | + | + | |||||
| Vanillic acid | 4 | + | + | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Eukovoside | + | |||||||
| Lithospermic acid | + | |||||||
| Plantamajoside | + | |||||||
| Verminoside | + | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Acacetin | + | |||||||
| Apigenin | 47 | (47) | + | + | + | + | ||
| Apigenin 7- | 40 | |||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 49 | |||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 39 | |||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 45 | |||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 46 | |||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 44 | |||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 32 | + | ||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 33 | + | ||||||
| Apigenin 7- | 38 | |||||||
| Apigetrin | (66 | |||||||
| Astragalin | (73 | |||||||
| Calcelarioside | + | |||||||
| Chrysoeriol | + | |||||||
| Cirsimaritin | 50 | (50) | + | |||||
| Eryodictyol | (68 | |||||||
| Galangin | + | |||||||
| Hispidulin | (67 | |||||||
| Isorhamentin | (74 | |||||||
| Isoquercetin | (72 | |||||||
| Kaempferol | - | + | ||||||
| Kaempferol dimethyl ether | + | |||||||
| Kaempferol monomethyl ether | + | |||||||
| Kaempferol O-hexoside | + | |||||||
| Luteolin | 42 | (42) | + | + | + | |||
| Luteolin-7-O-diglucuronide | + | |||||||
| Luleolin 7- | 41 | |||||||
| Luleolin 7- | 43 | |||||||
| Luleolin 7- | 31 | |||||||
| Luleolin 7- | 34 | |||||||
| Luteolin 7- | 37 | |||||||
| Luteolin 7- | 35 | |||||||
| Luteolin 7- | 36 | |||||||
| Naringenin | (69 | + | ||||||
| Quercetin | (70 | + | + | |||||
| Quercetin dimethyl ether | + | |||||||
| Quercetin tetramethyl ether | + | |||||||
| Quercetin trimethyl ether | + | |||||||
| Rhamnetin | + | |||||||
| Rutin | (71 | + | n.d. | |||||
| Thymusin | 48 | |||||||
| Vanillin | + | |||||||
| Xanthomicrol | 51 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Epideoxyloganic acid 1 | 59 | (59) | + | |||||
| Epideoxyloganic acid 2 | 61 | (59) | ||||||
| Epideoxyloganic acid 3 | 62 | (59) | ||||||
| Epideoxyloganic acid hexoside 1 | 55 | |||||||
| Epideoxyloganic acid hexoside 2 | 58 | |||||||
| Epideoxyloganic acid pentoside | 57 | |||||||
| Geniposidic acid | 60 | |||||||
| Ligstroside hexoside | + | |||||||
| Dihydrocornic acid | 53 | |||||||
| Nepetanudoside | 56 | |||||||
| Nepetanudoside B | 52 | |||||||
| Secologanin | 54 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| 12- | 63 | |||||||
| Quinic acid | (75 | + | ||||||
See .
See .
Based on identified compounds in this work and additional phenolic-related compounds (labeled 64.
Figure 5Comparison of the quantity of major compounds among in situ flowers, in situ leaves and in vitro leaves of N. nuda by using UHPLC/MS2 analysis. Based on identified compounds in this work and additional phenolic-related compounds (labeled 64* to 75*), in total 21 compounds were selected for comparative quantification. Heat map visualization. One-way ANOVA (Holm–Sidak) test was applied to determine the statistical difference between the variants (shown in different letters).
Figure 6Comparison of the quantity of major compounds between N. nuda light variants by using UHPLC/MS2 analysis. Based on identified compounds in this work and additional phenolic-related compounds (labeled 64* to 75*), in total 21 compounds were selected for comparative quantification. (A) Heat map visualization. One-way ANOVA (Holm–Sidak) test was applied to determine the statistical difference between the variants (shown in different letters). (B) PCA analysis. W, white light; BR, blue and red light; BRS, blue and red light with shadow.
Interrelation between biological activities and metabolites identified in Nepeta species.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Nepetoidin B | Lamiaceae | Grayer et al., | |
| Nepetalactones | Gkinis et al., | ||
| Methyl rosmarinate, clinopodic acid, salvianolic acid A, caffeic acid, syringic acid | Zhou et al., | ||
| Chlorogenic acid, RA, quinic acid | Aras et al., | ||
| RA, FA, chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, caffeic acid, luteolin derivatives | Dienaite et al., | ||
| Chlorgenic acid, FA | Sarikurkcu et al., | ||
| Phenols and flavonoids | Dordević et al., | ||
| Salvianolic acid A and B | water-soluble compounds | Zhang et al., | |
|
| |||
| Plant–herbivore and prey–predator interactions | Iridoids | Konno et al., | |
| Allelopathy | Water soluble allelochemicals | Dragoeva et al., | |
| Allelopathy | Esculetin | Reviewed in Cheng and Cheng, | |
| Allelopathy, antifeedant | Nepetodin, phenolic acid derivatives | Fraga et al., | |
| Allelopathy | 1,8 cineole | Kobaisy et al., | |
| Pulegone | Mancini et al., | ||
| Nepetalactones | Bozari et al., | ||
| Antiproliferative | Chlorogenic acid, RA, FA | Dienaite et al., | |
|
| |||
| Herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 (strain BA) | Na | Todorov et al., | |
| Herpes simplex virus type 1, (strain F) and type 2 (strain DD) | Simple phenols and flavonoids | Hinkov et al., | |
| HIV and other viruses | Caffeic acid, lithospermic acid, salvianolic acid A, methyl salvianolate A, protocatehuic aldehyde, apigenin, RA | Lamiaceae | Reviewed in Bekut et al., |
|
| |||
| Iridoids | Konno et al., | ||
|
| Stojanović et al., | ||
|
| Alim et al., | ||
|
| na | Nestorović et al., | |
| No activity against | na | Yildirim et al., | |
|
| na | Zomorodian et al., | |
|
| na | Al-Kahraman et al., | |
| Phytopathogenic bacteria (e.g., | 4aα,7β,7aα-nepetalactone, germacrene, elemol, β-caryophyllene, spathulenol, cubenol | Gormez et al., | |
|
| 1,8-cineole | Miladinović et al., | |
|
| Nepetoidin B | Zhou et al., | |
| oral pathogens | RA, verminoside | Smiljković et al., | |
|
| Phenols and flavonoids | Dordević et al., | |
| B. cereus, S. aureus | Nepetalactones, 1,5,9-ELA, RA | Aničić et al., | |
|
| FA, gallic acid | This study | |
na, not applicable.