Zeeshan Butt1, John Peipert, Kimberly Webster, Connie Chen, David Cella. 1. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Comprehensive Transplant Center, and Institute for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. z-butt@northwestern.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with poor long-term survival and has no cure. Traditional clinical endpoints are best supplemented by patient-reported outcomes designed to assess symptoms and function. Normative data was obtained on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (NFKSI) to aid in score interpretation and planning of future trials. METHODS: General population data were obtained from 2000 respondents, who completed the 19-item NFKSI-19, as well the SF-36 (Short Form 36-item instrument) and the PROMIS-29 (29-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), both general health status measures. Basic demographic and self-reported comorbidity data were also collected. RESULTS: The sample was 50% female, 85.7% caucasian, with an equal distribution across age bands from 18 years to 75 years and older. Most respondents (62.8%) had more than a high school education and reported an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of normal activity without symptoms (63.4%). Score distributions on the NFKSI-19, its subscales, and individual items are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The NFKSI-19 and its subscales now have scores for the general US population, allowing comparability to generic questionnaires such as the SF-36 and PROMIS-29. These data can be used to guide treatment expectations and plan future comparative effectiveness research using the scales.
BACKGROUND: Metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with poor long-term survival and has no cure. Traditional clinical endpoints are best supplemented by patient-reported outcomes designed to assess symptoms and function. Normative data was obtained on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (NFKSI) to aid in score interpretation and planning of future trials. METHODS: General population data were obtained from 2000 respondents, who completed the 19-item NFKSI-19, as well the SF-36 (Short Form 36-item instrument) and the PROMIS-29 (29-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), both general health status measures. Basic demographic and self-reported comorbidity data were also collected. RESULTS: The sample was 50% female, 85.7% caucasian, with an equal distribution across age bands from 18 years to 75 years and older. Most respondents (62.8%) had more than a high school education and reported an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of normal activity without symptoms (63.4%). Score distributions on the NFKSI-19, its subscales, and individual items are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: The NFKSI-19 and its subscales now have scores for the general US population, allowing comparability to generic questionnaires such as the SF-36 and PROMIS-29. These data can be used to guide treatment expectations and plan future comparative effectiveness research using the scales.
Authors: Honghu Liu; David Cella; Richard Gershon; Jie Shen; Leo S Morales; William Riley; Ron D Hays Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jennifer L Beaumont; Zeeshan Butt; Jeanfrancois Baladi; Robert J Motzer; Tomas Haas; Norbert Hollaender; Andrea Kay; David Cella Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-04-01
Authors: David Cella; Susan Yount; Penny S Brucker; Hongyan Du; Ronald Bukowski; Nicholas Vogelzang; William P Bro Journal: Value Health Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: David Cella; Diane Paul; Susan Yount; Rodger Winn; Chih-Hung Chang; Donald Banik; Jane Weeks Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: D Cella; M D Michaelson; A G Bushmakin; J C Cappelleri; C Charbonneau; S T Kim; J Z Li; R J Motzer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-26 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Thomas M Atkinson; Charissa F Andreotti; Kailey E Roberts; Rebecca M Saracino; Marisol Hernandez; Ethan Basch Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rana R McKay; Dominick Bossé; Kathryn P Gray; M Dror Michaelson; Katherine Krajewski; Heather A Jacene; Meghara Walsh; Joaquim Bellmunt; Mark Pomerantz; Lauren C Harshman; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David Cella; Bernard Escudier; Nizar M Tannir; Thomas Powles; Frede Donskov; Katriina Peltola; Manuela Schmidinger; Daniel Y C Heng; Paul N Mainwaring; Hans J Hammers; Jae Lyun Lee; Bruce J Roth; Florence Marteau; Paul Williams; John Baer; Milan Mangeshkar; Christian Scheffold; Thomas E Hutson; Sumanta Pal; Robert J Motzer; Toni K Choueiri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nan E Rothrock; Sally E Jensen; Jennifer L Beaumont; Amy P Abernethy; Paul B Jacobsen; Karen Syrjala; David Cella Journal: Value Health Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Marina Serper; Daniela P Ladner; Laura M Curtis; Sumi S Nair; Scott I Hur; Mary J Kwasny; Bing Ho; John Friedewald; Peter P Reese; Michael M I Abecassis; Michael S Wolf Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: D Cella; B Escudier; B Rini; C Chen; H Bhattacharyya; J Tarazi; B Rosbrook; S Kim; R Motzer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 7.640