OBJECTIVES: The development of integrated magnetic resonance (MR)-positron emission tomography (PET) hybrid imaging opens up new horizons for imaging in neuro-oncology. In cerebral gliomas the definition of tumour extent may be difficult to ascertain using standard MR imaging (MRI) only. The differentiation of post-therapeutic scar tissue, tumour rests and tumour recurrence is challenging. The relationship to structures such as the pyramidal tract to the tumour mass influences the therapeutic neurosurgical approach. METHODS: The diagnostic information may be enriched by sophisticated MR techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), multiple-volume proton MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and functional MRI (fMRI). Metabolic imaging with PET, especially using amino acid tracers such as (18)F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) or (11)C-L-methionine (MET) will indicate tumour extent and response to treatment. RESULTS: The new technologies comprising MR-PET hybrid systems have the advantage of providing comprehensive answers by a one-stop-job of 40-50 min. The combined approach provides data of different modalities using the same iso-centre, resulting in optimal spatial and temporal realignment. All images are acquired exactly under the same physiological conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the imaging protocol in detail and provide patient examples for the different imaging modalities such as FET-PET, standard structural imaging (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T1-weighted contrast agent enhanced), DTI, MRSI and fMRI. KEY POINTS: Hybrid MR-PET opens up new horizons in neuroimaging. Hybrid MR-PET allows brain tumour assessment in one stop. Hybrid MR-PET allows simultaneous acquisition of structural, functional and molecular images.
OBJECTIVES: The development of integrated magnetic resonance (MR)-positron emission tomography (PET) hybrid imaging opens up new horizons for imaging in neuro-oncology. In cerebral gliomas the definition of tumour extent may be difficult to ascertain using standard MR imaging (MRI) only. The differentiation of post-therapeutic scar tissue, tumour rests and tumour recurrence is challenging. The relationship to structures such as the pyramidal tract to the tumour mass influences the therapeutic neurosurgical approach. METHODS: The diagnostic information may be enriched by sophisticated MR techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), multiple-volume proton MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and functional MRI (fMRI). Metabolic imaging with PET, especially using amino acid tracers such as (18)F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) or (11)C-L-methionine (MET) will indicate tumour extent and response to treatment. RESULTS: The new technologies comprising MR-PET hybrid systems have the advantage of providing comprehensive answers by a one-stop-job of 40-50 min. The combined approach provides data of different modalities using the same iso-centre, resulting in optimal spatial and temporal realignment. All images are acquired exactly under the same physiological conditions. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the imaging protocol in detail and provide patient examples for the different imaging modalities such as FET-PET, standard structural imaging (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T1-weighted contrast agent enhanced), DTI, MRSI and fMRI. KEY POINTS: Hybrid MR-PET opens up new horizons in neuroimaging. Hybrid MR-PET allows brain tumour assessment in one stop. Hybrid MR-PET allows simultaneous acquisition of structural, functional and molecular images.
Authors: Jagriti Arora; Kenneth Pugh; Michael Westerveld; Susan Spencer; Dennis D Spencer; R Todd Constable Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Christoph Stippich; Nora Rapps; Jens Dreyhaupt; Anita Durst; Bodo Kress; Ernst Nennig; Volker M Tronnier; Klaus Sartor Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Dirk Pauleit; Gabriele Stoffels; Ansgar Bachofner; Frank W Floeth; Michael Sabel; Hans Herzog; Lutz Tellmann; Paul Jansen; Guido Reifenberger; Kurt Hamacher; Heinz H Coenen; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-03-20
Authors: V Neuschmelting; C Weiss Lucas; G Stoffels; A-M Oros-Peusquens; H Lockau; N J Shah; K-J Langen; R Goldbrunner; C Grefkes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Antoine Verger; Christian P Filss; Philipp Lohmann; Gabriele Stoffels; Michael Sabel; Hans J Wittsack; Elena Rota Kops; Norbert Galldiks; Gereon R Fink; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Maria R Ponisio; Jonathan E McConathy; Sonika M Dahiya; Michelle M Miller-Thomas; Keith M Rich; Amber Salter; Qing Wang; Pamela J LaMontagne; Gloria J Guzmán Pérez-Carrillo; Tammie L S Benzinger Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2020-08-07