Literature DB >> 22776864

Cost and management of males with closed fractures.

S K Brenneman1, N Yurgin, Y Fan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to examine the medical costs and the management of osteoporosis in the 12 months after a closed fracture for men aged ≥ 45 years. The mean medical cost per fracture was high ($6,078-$30,900), and osteoporosis management post fracture was inadequate in the majority of men.
INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted in order to examine the medical costs following fracture in males and the management of osteoporosis post fracture.
METHODS: Administrative claims from a large, national health plan were analyzed. Men ≥ 45 years were included if they had ≥ 1 medical claim for a new closed fracture between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008. Commercially insured (COM) and Medicare Advantage Plan (MAP) members were analyzed separately. Costs were calculated as paid amounts and adjusted to 2010 dollars. Both the differences between the individual patients' 12-month pre-fracture and 12-month post-fracture costs and the costs directly attributed to the fracture were reported. The prevalence of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan and/or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy treatment was evaluated in the 12 months post fracture.
RESULTS: We identified 18,917 (COM, 16,191; MAP, 2,726) men with new closed fractures. Non-hip, non-vertebral fractures (NHNV) were the most common fracture in both COM and MAP populations. Fracture costs ranged from $7,121 to $15,830 for vertebral fractures, from $22,601 to $30,900 for hip fractures, and from $6,078 to $8,344 for NHNV fractures. In the COM and MAP populations, respectively, 8.5 and 15.5 % had a DXA scan and/or osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in the 12 months following the fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare costs associated with fractures in men are substantial. About 1 in 12 men ≥ 45 years in the COM population were provided adequate follow-up for osteoporosis post fracture. While this rate improved to about one in six men in the MAP population, osteoporosis management in men post fracture is far from optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22776864     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  21 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for treatment of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  T Diamond; P Sambrook; M Williamson; L Flicker; C Nowson; M Fiatarone-Singh; S Lord; L Ferris; S O'Neil; A MacLennan
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2001-08

2.  Compliance with osteoporosis drug therapy and risk of fracture.

Authors:  D Weycker; D Macarios; J Edelsberg; G Oster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Khajak J Ishak; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Jay Magaziner; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Dirk Vanderschueren; Koen Milisen; Brigitte Velkeniers; Steven Boonen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Fragility fracture-related direct medical costs in the first year following a nonvertebral fracture in a managed care setting.

Authors:  Robert L Ohsfeldt; Natalie N Borisov; Richard L Sheer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  A perspective on male osteoporosis.

Authors:  Neil Binkley
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Health care expenditures associated with skeletal fractures among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; David J Becker; Lisa C Gary; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag; Huifeng Yun; Robert Matthews; Wilson Smith; Allison Taylor; Tarun Arora; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Trends in drug prescribing for osteoporosis after hip fracture, 1995-2004.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Jeffrey N Katz; M Alan Brookhart; Raisa Levin; Margaret R Stedman; Niteesh K Choudhry; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Pawel Szulc; Jean Marc Kaufman; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2012-04-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Strategies for Men.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Melissa Steffen; Taisha Doo; Heather S Healy; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Osteoporosis Treatment Efficacy for Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Denosumab for Elderly Men with Osteoporosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the US Payer Perspective.

Authors:  Stuart Silverman; Irene Agodoa; Morgan Kruse; Anju Parthan; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2015-12-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.