Literature DB >> 22775528

Camouflage through an active choice of a resting spot and body orientation in moths.

C-K Kang1, J-Y Moon, S-I Lee, P G Jablonski.   

Abstract

Cryptic colour patterns in prey are classical examples of adaptations to avoid predation, but we still know little about behaviours that reinforce the match between animal body and the background. For example, moths avoid predators by matching their colour patterns with the background. Active choice of a species-specific body orientation has been suggested as an important function of body positioning behaviour performed by moths after landing on the bark. However, the contribution of this behaviour to moths' crypticity has not been directly measured. From observations of geometrid moths, Hypomecis roboraria and Jankowskia fuscaria, we determined that the positioning behaviour, which consists of walking and turning the body while repeatedly lifting and lowering the wings, resulted in new resting spots and body orientations in J. fuscaria and in new resting spots in H. roboraria. The body positioning behaviour of the two species significantly decreased the probability of visual detection by humans, who viewed photographs of the moths taken before and after the positioning behaviour. This implies that body positioning significantly increases the camouflage effect provided by moth's cryptic colour pattern regardless of whether the behaviour involves a new body orientation or not. Our study demonstrates that the evolution of morphological adaptations, such as colour pattern of moths, cannot be fully understood without taking into account a behavioural phenotype that coevolved with the morphology for increasing the adaptive value of the morphological trait.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2012 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22775528     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  15 in total

1.  Jewelled spiders manipulate colour-lure geometry to deceive prey.

Authors:  Thomas E White
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  How camouflage works.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Fine nanostructural variation in the wing pattern of a moth Chiasmia eleonora Cramer (1780).

Authors:  Shaunak Ghosh; Monalisa Mishra
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Cognition and the evolution of camouflage.

Authors:  John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Predator responses to prey camouflage strategies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Vitor de Alcantara Viana; Camila Vieira; Rafael Campos Duarte; Gustavo Quevedo Romero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Cryptically patterned moths perceive bark structure when choosing body orientations that match wing color pattern to the bark pattern.

Authors:  Chang-Ku Kang; Jong-Yeol Moon; Sang-Im Lee; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Camouflage and individual variation in shore crabs (Carcinus maenas) from different habitats.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Alice E Lown; Louisa E Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Microhabitat choice in island lizards enhances camouflage against avian predators.

Authors:  Kate L A Marshall; Kate E Philpot; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Facing the Heat: Does Desiccation and Thermal Stress Explain Patterns of Orientation in an Intertidal Invertebrate?

Authors:  Clarissa M L Fraser; Frank Seebacher; Justin Lathlean; Ross A Coleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improvement of individual camouflage through background choice in ground-nesting birds.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Jolyon Troscianko; Jared K Wilson-Aggarwal; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 15.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.