Xue-Fei He1, Yi-Ting Liu, Cheng Peng, Fan Zhang, Shi Zhuang, Jin-Song Zhang. 1. Key Laboratory of Lens Research Liaoning Province, Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang 110005, Liaoning Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the difference of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness between Alzheimer's disease patients and normal people, so as to provide clue for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: The articles on the association of RNFL thickness and Alzheimer's disease were retrieved by searching international and national databases. The qualified articles were assessed by meta analysis with Stata11.0 software. The results were pooled using weighted mean difference (WMD) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Totally 7 studies enrolled 324 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. The results of meta analysis showed that in AD patients, there was a significant average RNFL thickness reduction compared with the control group [WMD=-17.561, 95%CI: (-23.971, -11.151)]. There were significant differences in superior, inferior, nasal and temporal RNFL thickness between the two groups. WMD with a 95%CI were [-18.829, 95%CI:(-25.915, -11.743); P<0.05], [-25.775, 95%CI:(-34.304, -17.247); P<0.05], [-16.877, 95%CI: (-29.141, -4.613); P<0.001] and [-14.565, 95%CI:(-28.002, -1.128); P<0.001] respectively. Begg's test and Egger's test did not show significant difference, funnel plot was basically symmetrical, indicating that there was no publication bias existed. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the RNFL thickness in all quadrants between the two groups. RNFL thickness is reduced in AD patients compared with the control group.
AIM: To investigate the difference of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness between Alzheimer's diseasepatients and normal people, so as to provide clue for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: The articles on the association of RNFL thickness and Alzheimer's disease were retrieved by searching international and national databases. The qualified articles were assessed by meta analysis with Stata11.0 software. The results were pooled using weighted mean difference (WMD) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Totally 7 studies enrolled 324 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. The results of meta analysis showed that in ADpatients, there was a significant average RNFL thickness reduction compared with the control group [WMD=-17.561, 95%CI: (-23.971, -11.151)]. There were significant differences in superior, inferior, nasal and temporal RNFL thickness between the two groups. WMD with a 95%CI were [-18.829, 95%CI:(-25.915, -11.743); P<0.05], [-25.775, 95%CI:(-34.304, -17.247); P<0.05], [-16.877, 95%CI: (-29.141, -4.613); P<0.001] and [-14.565, 95%CI:(-28.002, -1.128); P<0.001] respectively. Begg's test and Egger's test did not show significant difference, funnel plot was basically symmetrical, indicating that there was no publication bias existed. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the RNFL thickness in all quadrants between the two groups. RNFL thickness is reduced in ADpatients compared with the control group.
Authors: J N Ratchford; M E Quigg; A Conger; T Frohman; E Frohman; L J Balcer; P A Calabresi; D A Kerr Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona; Thomas Kregel; Arno Schmidt; Elmar H Pinkhardt; Florian Lauda; Jan Kassubek; Bernhard J Connemann; Roland W Freudenmann; Maximilian Gahr Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Thasarat Sutabutr Vajaranant; Joelle Hallak; Mark A Espeland; Louis R Pasquale; Barbara E Klein; Stacy M Meuer; Stephen R Rapp; Mary N Haan; Pauline M Maki Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Francisco J Ascaso; Nancy Cruz; Pedro J Modrego; Raul Lopez-Anton; Javier Santabárbara; Luis F Pascual; Antonio Lobo; José A Cristóbal Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Gema Rebolleda; Laura Diez-Alvarez; Alfonso Casado; Carmen Sánchez-Sánchez; Elisabet de Dompablo; Julio J González-López; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete Journal: Saudi J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-10-05
Authors: Victor T T Chan; Zihan Sun; Shumin Tang; Li Jia Chen; Adrian Wong; Clement C Tham; Tien Y Wong; Christopher Chen; M Kamran Ikram; Heather E Whitson; Eleonora M Lad; Vincent C T Mok; Carol Y Cheung Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: J P Cunha; N Moura-Coelho; R P Proença; A Dias-Santos; J Ferreira; C Louro; A Castanheira-Dinis Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 3.117