Literature DB >> 2277260

The work and energetic cost of locomotion. I. The effects of limb mass distribution in quadrupeds.

K Steudel1.   

Abstract

Does limb design influence the cost of locomotion in quadrupedal mammals? If not, morphologists must dismiss the economy of locomotion from consideration when assessing the adaptive factors shaping limb structure. Several studies have recently used externally applied loads to demonstrate a relationship between limb mass distribution and energy costs in human subjects. It is not clear whether a similar correlation would hold for quadrupeds, given their very different gaits. The present study addresses this question by measuring the rate of oxygen consumption in domestic dogs running on a treadmill with mass added either to the limbs or to the back. Trials with no additional mass were used as a control. The use of externally applied loads has the advantage of allowing limb mass to be altered in a system in which other aspects of physiology that might influence cost of locomotion are held constant. The cost of adding mass to the limbs in dogs was found to be significantly greater than that of adding it at the center of mass. Limb mass distribution does affect the cost of locomotion in quadrupeds. A comparison of the results from a variety of studies in which the energetic cost of adding external loads has been measured in animals across a wide size range suggests a qualitative difference in the factors determining the cost of locomotion in large and small animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2277260     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.154.1.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Muscle architecture and functional anatomy of the pelvic limb of the ostrich (Struthio camelus).

Authors:  N C Smith; A M Wilson; K J Jespers; R C Payne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Compliance, actuation, and work characteristics of the goat foreleg and hindleg during level, uphill, and downhill running.

Authors:  David V Lee; M Polly McGuigan; Edwin H Yoo; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-10-18

3.  Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-19

4.  The energetic benefits of tendon springs in running: is the reduction of muscle work important?

Authors:  Natalie C Holt; Thomas J Roberts; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Specialization for aggression in sexually dimorphic skeletal morphology in grey wolves (Canis lupus).

Authors:  Jeremy S Morris; Ellissa K Brandt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  A disparity between locomotor economy and territory-holding ability in male house mice.

Authors:  Jeremy S Morris; James S Ruff; Wayne K Potts; David R Carrier
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Mechanical constraints on the functional morphology of the gibbon hind limb.

Authors:  Anthony J Channon; Michael M Günther; Robin H Crompton; Evie E Vereecke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  A stop-signal task for sheep: introduction and validation of a direct measure for the stop-signal reaction time.

Authors:  Franziska Knolle; Sebastian D McBride; James E Stewart; Rita P Goncalves; A Jennifer Morton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Scale effects between body size and limb design in quadrupedal mammals.

Authors:  Brandon M Kilbourne; Louwrens C Hoffman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The influence of load carrying on the energetics and kinematics of terrestrial locomotion in a diving bird.

Authors:  Peter G Tickle; Samantha C Lean; Kayleigh A R Rose; Avanti P Wadugodapitiya; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.