OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in otosclerosis, with special emphasis on middle- and inner-ear anatomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS: Twenty patients who underwent a stapedectomy 30 years ago were selected on the basis of bone conduction threshold values. Their mean age was 65 years (range, 48-76 yr). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent CBCT and MSCT with a slice thickness of 0.5 to 0.6 mm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sixteen middle- and inner-ear anatomic structures and stapedial prostheses were analyzed by visual grading analysis. To assess critical reproduction and thereby the clinical applicability of CBCT, a dichotomization was made. Assessment of otosclerotic foci was performed using a grading system dividing the lesions in; (1) sole fenestral lesions, (2) retrofenestral lesions with or without fenestral lesions and (3) severe retrofenestral lesions. RESULTS: The 16 anatomic structures were clearly reproduced by both imaging techniques. However, there was an interobserver variation in judging the superiority of 1 method in favor of the other. Otosclerotic lesions were diagnosed in 80/95% using MSCT and 50/85% using CBCT (evaluators 1 and 2, respectively). Retrofenestral lesions were diagnosed in 5 of 10 of ears with severe-to-profound hearing loss, whereas no retrofenestral lesions were diagnosed in the 10 ears with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The stapedial prostheses were adequately or very well reproduced by both methods. CONCLUSION: CBCT is a new imaging technique with a considerably lower radiation dose than conventional MSCT. Our study indicates that CBCT is suitable and, in many ways, equivalent to MSCT, for temporal bone imaging in otosclerosis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in otosclerosis, with special emphasis on middle- and inner-ear anatomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS: Twenty patients who underwent a stapedectomy 30 years ago were selected on the basis of bone conduction threshold values. Their mean age was 65 years (range, 48-76 yr). INTERVENTION: All patients underwent CBCT and MSCT with a slice thickness of 0.5 to 0.6 mm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sixteen middle- and inner-ear anatomic structures and stapedial prostheses were analyzed by visual grading analysis. To assess critical reproduction and thereby the clinical applicability of CBCT, a dichotomization was made. Assessment of otosclerotic foci was performed using a grading system dividing the lesions in; (1) sole fenestral lesions, (2) retrofenestral lesions with or without fenestral lesions and (3) severe retrofenestral lesions. RESULTS: The 16 anatomic structures were clearly reproduced by both imaging techniques. However, there was an interobserver variation in judging the superiority of 1 method in favor of the other. Otosclerotic lesions were diagnosed in 80/95% using MSCT and 50/85% using CBCT (evaluators 1 and 2, respectively). Retrofenestral lesions were diagnosed in 5 of 10 of ears with severe-to-profound hearing loss, whereas no retrofenestral lesions were diagnosed in the 10 ears with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The stapedial prostheses were adequately or very well reproduced by both methods. CONCLUSION: CBCT is a new imaging technique with a considerably lower radiation dose than conventional MSCT. Our study indicates that CBCT is suitable and, in many ways, equivalent to MSCT, for temporal bone imaging in otosclerosis.
Authors: Péter Révész; Balázs Liktor; Bálint Liktor; István Sziklai; Imre Gerlinger; Tamás Karosi Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Sandeep Govindan Prasad; Suma Radhakrishnan; E Devarajan; Rinu Susan Thomas; Lin Varghese Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-02-06
Authors: Balázs Liktor; Péter Révész; Péter Csomor; Imre Gerlinger; István Sziklai; Tamás Karosi Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Pekka Tamminen; Jorma Järnstedt; Antti Lehtinen; Jura Numminen; Lauri Lehtimäki; Markus Rautiainen; Ilkka Kivekäs Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: Giampietro Ricci; Ruggero Lapenna; Valeria Gambacorta; Antonio Della Volpe; Mario Faralli; Arianna Di Stadio Journal: J Int Adv Otol Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 1.316