Literature DB >> 22771027

Does higher starting dose of FSH stimulation with letrozole improve fertility preservation outcomes in women with breast cancer?

Sanghoon Lee1, Kutluk Oktay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ovarian stimulation with higher doses of gonadotropins in fertility preservation (FP) cycles with the intention to maximize the likelihood of future pregnancies.
DESIGN: Retrospective (secondary analysis).
SETTING: Academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): Low-dose (LD, 150 IU; n = 34) versus high-dose (HD, >150 IU; n = 117) FSH start in 151 patients with breast cancer (BCa) undergoing ovarian stimulation for embryo cryopreservation with letrozole (LE) before cancer treatment. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): FP cycle outcomes. RESULT(S): Mean total FSH dose (2,037 ± 679 IU vs. 1,128 ± 381 IU) and FSH level on trigger day (21.1 ± 8.9 vs. 10.6 ± 4.5 mIU/mL) were higher in the HD group, confirming the receipt of higher-dose FSH. There was no difference in other patient characteristics. Despite the larger number of follicles >17 mm in diameter in the HD group (5.0 ± 2.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), neither peak E(2) (498.0 ± 377.5 vs. 397.9 ± 320.3), number of oocytes (13.3 ± 8.7 vs. 12.3 ± 8.0), nor number of embryos (6.3 ± 4.7 vs. 5.4 ± 3.8) were significantly different from the LD group. Of those undergoing frozen embryo transfer (ET), live birth rate (LBR)/ET trended higher in the LD (9/15) compared with HD (2/11) group, with 2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 embryos transferred, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Higher-dose FSH stimulation in LE cycles does not improve outcomes and may be associated with lower LBR. Our findings may support minimal stimulation in young noninfertile women with BCa.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22771027      PMCID: PMC3777251          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther B Baart; Elena Martini; Marinus J Eijkemans; Diane Van Opstal; Nicole G M Beckers; Arie Verhoeff; Nicolas S Macklon; Bart C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Less is more: increased gonadotropin use for ovarian stimulation adversely influences clinical pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Lubna Pal; Sangita Jindal; Barry R Witt; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Letrozole reduces estrogen and gonadotropin exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Ariel Hourvitz; Gulnaz Sahin; Ozgur Oktem; Bradley Safro; Aylin Cil; Heejung Bang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; Leslie R Schover; Ann H Partridge; Pasquale Patrizio; W Hamish Wallace; Karen Hagerty; Lindsay N Beck; Lawrence V Brennan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Aromatase inhibition reduces gonadotrophin dose required for controlled ovarian stimulation in women with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  M F M Mitwally; R F Casper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Cost-saving treatment strategies in in vitro fertilization: a combined economic evaluation of two large randomized clinical trials comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alpha.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Wechowski; Mark Connolly; Dirk Schneider; Philip McEwan; Richard Kennedy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Safety of fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in patients with breast cancer: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Amr A Azim; Maria Costantini-Ferrando; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Increased gonadotrophin stimulation does not improve IVF outcomes in patients with predicted poor ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Dharmawijaya N Lekamge; Michelle Lane; Robert B Gilchrist; Kelton P Tremellen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced human ovarian aging: double strand DNA breaks and microvascular compromise.

Authors:  Reza Soleimani; Elke Heytens; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Does timing of adjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis after early breast cancer? Results of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

Authors:  S Cold; M Düring; M Ewertz; A Knoop; S Møller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Fifteen year follow-up of embryos cryopreserved in cancer patients for fertility preservation.

Authors:  J Barcroft; N Dayoub; K J Thong
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Exogenous reproductive hormone use in breast cancer survivors and previvors.

Authors:  Ines Vaz-Luis; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Fertility preservation in women with cancer.

Authors:  Sanghoon Lee; Jae Yun Song; Seung Yup Ku; Sun Haeng Kim; Tak Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2012-06-30

5.  Challenging iatrogenic menopause. Oncofertility programme in Poland - a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Anna Horbaczewska; Robert Jach; Andrzej Zmaczyński; Olga Kacalska-Janssen; Katarzyna Doroszewska; Magdalena Piróg; Monika Kabzińska-Turek
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2019-06-14

6.  Responses to fertility treatment among patients with cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A V Dolinko; L V Farland; S A Missmer; S S Srouji; C Racowsky; E S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 7.  Fertility preservation healthcare circuit and networks in cancer patients worldwide: what are the issues?

Authors:  Kathleen Melan; Frederic Amant; Jacqueline Veronique-Baudin; Clarisse Joachim; Eustase Janky
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?

Authors:  Moran Shapira; Raoul Orvieto; Oshrit Lebovitz; Ravit Nahum; Adva Aizer; Aliza Segev-Zahav; Jigal Haas
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 9.  Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sooyoung Kim; Younji Lee; Sanghoon Lee; Tak Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 10.  Advances in the Treatment and Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Toxicity.

Authors:  Hyun-Woong Cho; Sanghoon Lee; Kyung-Jin Min; Jin Hwa Hong; Jae Yun Song; Jae Kwan Lee; Nak Woo Lee; Tak Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.