Literature DB >> 22768876

Combinatorial use of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) and strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.

Mostafa Zarei1, Adrian Sprenger, Christine Gretzmeier, Joern Dengjel.   

Abstract

In large-scale phosphoproteomics studies, fractionation by strong cation exchange (SCX) or electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) is commonly used to reduce sample complexity, fractionate phosphopeptides from their unmodified counterparts, and increase the dynamic range for phosphopeptide identification. However, these procedures do not succeed to separate, both singly and multiply phosphorylated peptides due to their inverse physicochemical characteristics. Hence, depending on the chosen method only one of the two peptide classes can be efficiently separated. Here, we present a novel strategy based on the combinatorial separation of singly and multiply phosphorylated peptides by SCX and ERLIC for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. In SCX, mostly singly phosphorylated peptides are retained and fractionated while not-retained multiply phosphorylated peptides are fractionated in a subsequent ERLIC approach (SCX-ERLIC). In ERLIC, multiply phosphorylated peptides are fractionated, while not-retained singly phosphorylated peptides are separated by SCX (ERLIC-SCX). Compared to single step fractionations by SCX, the combinatorial strategies, SCX-ERLIC and ERLIC-SCX, yield up to 48% more phosphopeptide identifications as well as a strong increase in the number of detected multiphosphorylated peptides. Phosphopeptides identified in two subsequent, complementary fractionations had little overlap (5%) indicating that ERLIC and SCX are orthogonal methods ideally suited for in-depth phosphoproteome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22768876     DOI: 10.1021/pr300375d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  10 in total

1.  Comprehensive and reproducible phosphopeptide enrichment using iron immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (Fe-IMAC) columns.

Authors:  Benjamin Ruprecht; Heiner Koch; Guillaume Medard; Max Mundt; Bernhard Kuster; Simone Lemeer
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Fast and easy phosphopeptide fractionation by combinatorial ERLIC-SCX solid-phase extraction for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.

Authors:  Mostafa Zarei; Adrian Sprenger; Michal Rackiewicz; Joern Dengjel
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Recent advances in enrichment and separation strategies for mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Chenxi Yang; Xuefei Zhong; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Characterization of early autophagy signaling by quantitative phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Kristoffer Tg Rigbolt; Mostafa Zarei; Adrian Sprenger; Andrea C Becker; Britta Diedrich; Xun Huang; Sven Eiselein; Anders R Kristensen; Christine Gretzmeier; Jens S Andersen; Zhike Zi; Jörn Dengjel
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 5.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  A Phosphoproteomic Comparison of B-RAFV600E and MKK1/2 Inhibitors in Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Scott A Stuart; Stephane Houel; Thomas Lee; Nan Wang; William M Old; Natalie G Ahn
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Recent advances in phosphoproteomics and application to neurological diseases.

Authors:  Justine V Arrington; Chuan-Chih Hsu; Sarah G Elder; W Andy Tao
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Anion-exchange chromatography of phosphopeptides: weak anion exchange versus strong anion exchange and anion-exchange chromatography versus electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography.

Authors:  Andrew J Alpert; Otto Hudecz; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  A protein deep sequencing evaluation of metastatic melanoma tissues.

Authors:  Charlotte Welinder; Krzysztof Pawłowski; Yutaka Sugihara; Maria Yakovleva; Göran Jönsson; Christian Ingvar; Lotta Lundgren; Bo Baldetorp; Håkan Olsson; Melinda Rezeli; Bo Jansson; Thomas Laurell; Thomas Fehniger; Balazs Döme; Johan Malm; Elisabet Wieslander; Toshihide Nishimura; György Marko-Varga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.